Literature DB >> 33655610

Chicago Classification update (v4.0): Technical review of high-resolution manometry metrics for EGJ barrier function.

Peter J Kahrilas1, Ravinder K Mittal2, Serhat Bor3, Geoffrey P Kohn4,5, Johannes Lenglinger6, Sumeet K Mittal7, John E Pandolfino1, Jordi Serra8, Roger Tatum9, Rena Yadlapati2.   

Abstract

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) barrier function is of fundamental importance in the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Impaired EGJ barrier function leads to excessive distal esophageal acid exposure or, in severe cases, esophagitis. Hence, proposed high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics assessing EGJ integrity are clinically important and were a focus of the Chicago Classification (CC) working group for inclusion in CC v4.0. However, the EGJ is a complex sphincter comprised of both crural diaphragm (CD) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) component, each of which is subject to independent physiological control mechanisms and pathophysiology. No single metric can capture all attributes of EGJ barrier function. The working group considered several potential metrics of EGJ integrity including LES-CD separation, the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), the respiratory inversion point (RIP), and intragastric pressure. Strong recommendations were made regarding LES-CD separation as indicative of hiatus hernia, although the numerical threshold for defining hiatal hernia was not agreed upon. There was no agreement on the significance of the RIP, only that it could localize either above the LES or between the LES and CD in cases of hiatus hernia. There was agreement on how to measure the EGJ-CI and that it should be referenced to gastric pressure in units of mmHg cm, but the numerical threshold indicative of a hypotensive EGJ varied widely among reports and was not agreed upon. Intragastric pressure was endorsed as an important metric worthy of further study but there was no agreement on a numerical threshold indicative of abdominal obesity.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chicago classification; esophageal manometry; gastroesophageal reflux disease; hiatal hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33655610      PMCID: PMC8410874          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.960


  26 in total

1.  Accuracy of hiatal hernia detection with esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  P W Weijenborg; F B van Hoeij; A J P M Smout; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Role of the lower esophageal sphincter on acid exposure revisited with high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Masato Hoshino; Abhishek Sundaram; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  3D-high resolution manometry of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  M A Kwiatek; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ-Contractile Integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non-responders.

Authors:  F Nicodème; M Pipa-Muniz; K Khanna; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Esophagogastric Junction pressure morphology: comparison between a station pull-through and real-time 3D-HRM representation.

Authors:  F Nicodème; Z Lin; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux.

Authors:  Albert J Bredenoord; Bas L A M Weusten; Robin Timmer; André J P M Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention.

Authors:  D Wang; A Patel; M Mello; A Shriver; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  High-resolution manometry is superior to endoscopy and radiology in assessing and grading sliding hiatal hernia: A comparison with surgical in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Salvatore Tolone; Edoardo Savarino; Giovanni Zaninotto; C Prakash Gyawali; Marzio Frazzoni; Nicola de Bortoli; Leonardo Frazzoni; Gianmattia Del Genio; Giorgia Bodini; Manuele Furnari; Vincenzo Savarino; Ludovico Docimo
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Morphology of the Esophageal Hiatus: Is It Different in 3 Types of Hiatus Hernias?

Authors:  Dushyant Kumar; Ali Zifan; Gary Ghahremani; David C Kunkel; Santiago Horgan; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Breathing Exercises in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucie Zdrhova; Petr Bitnar; Karel Balihar; Pavel Kolar; Katerina Madle; Milan Martinek; John Erik Pandolfino; Jan Martinek
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  How Updates in Chicago Classification Impact Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Foregut (Thousand Oaks)       Date:  2021-08-20

3.  Modified Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Technique for Type II Achalasia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Huahui Zhang; Kuangjing Wang; Ying Fang; Zhe Xiong; Min Lin; Lifeng Jiang; Qiuya Niu; Jin Huang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.