Literature DB >> 25082444

Calculation of esophagogastric junction vector volume using three-dimensional high-resolution manometry.

F Nicodème1,2, N J Soper3, Z Lin1, J E Pandolfino1, P J Kahrilas1.   

Abstract

Lower esophageal sphincter vector volume (V-V) was developed in the late 1980s by Bombeck, as a quantification of sphincter integrity used to select reflux patients with a defective valve who may benefit from surgery. Its calculation required motorized pull-through of an 8-lumen water perfused manometry catheter with subsequent computerized reconstruction of sphincter morphology. Recently, a three-dimensional high-resolution manometry (3D-HRM) assembly (Given Imaging, Duluth, GA, USA) has been developed with the potential to assess real-time V-V. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the calculation of V-V using the 3D-HRM assembly and to compare measures of its value using real-time 3D-HRM to simulated analogous measures. Eight asymptomatic controls (4F, ages 26-49) were studied in a supine position with a solid-state 3D-HRM assembly positioned across the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). The 9-cm 3D segment comprised 12 rings of 8 radially dispersed pressure sensors, each 2.5 mm long and spaced 7.5 mm apart on center. Recordings were done during normal respiration: (i) with the 3D-HRM segment in a stationary position across the EGJ; and (ii) during a station pull-through of the 3D-HRM segment withdrawing it across the EGJ at 5-mm increments with each position held for 30 seconds. EGJ cross-sectional vector areas (CSVAs) were computed using the irregular polygon area formula: [Formula in text], and n = 8 radial sensors. V-V was computed as the sum of CSVAs at inspiration and end-expiration by three methods: real-time 3D-HRM, three-station composite, and single-sensor ring measurements. There were no statistic differences among the methods, and all methods showed significant differences between inspiration and expiration. Calculation of real-time V-V is feasible using the 3D-HRM. Moreover, the results of this study highlighted the potential primary role of the diaphragmatic hiatus in the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease and the underrecognized but crucial role of the crural repair during the antireflux surgery.
© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal pressure topography; esophagogastric junction; gastroesophageal reflux disease; lower esophageal sphincter; three-dimensional-high resolution manometry; vector volume

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25082444      PMCID: PMC4312753          DOI: 10.1111/dote.12262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  18 in total

1.  Factors determining pressure measurement accuracy by intraluminal esophageal manometry.

Authors:  W J Dodds; J J Stef; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Lower esophageal sphincter analysis using computerized manometry in patients with chagasic megaesophagus.

Authors:  C G Andrade; I Cecconello; A Nasi; B Zilberstein; J R Filho; P J Campos Carvalho; P Donahue; J J Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  H J Stein; T R DeMeester; R Naspetti; J Jamieson; R E Perry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in healthy subjects and gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  G J Wetscher; R A Hinder; G Perdikis; T Wieschemeier; R Stalzer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Sphincterlike thoracoabdominal high pressure zone after esophagogastrectomy.

Authors:  W A Klein; H P Parkman; D T Dempsey; R S Fisher
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Who benefits from antireflux surgery?

Authors:  H J Stein; T R DeMeester
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  3D-high resolution manometry of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  M A Kwiatek; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Manometric vector volume analysis to assess lower esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  H J Stein; O Korn; D Liebermann-Meffert
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1995

9.  Computerized axial manometry of the esophagus. A new method for the assessment of antireflux operations.

Authors:  C T Bombeck; O Vaz; J DeSalvo; P E Donahue; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Esophagogastric Junction pressure morphology: comparison between a station pull-through and real-time 3D-HRM representation.

Authors:  F Nicodème; Z Lin; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Technique of Hill's Gastropexy Combined with Sleeve Gastrectomy for Patients with Morbid Obesity and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease or Hiatal Hernia.

Authors:  Andrés Sánchez-Pernaute; Pablo Talavera; Elia Pérez-Aguirre; Inmaculada Domínguez-Serrano; Miguel Ángel Rubio; Antonio Torres
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Study of the Esophagogastric Junction in Patients with Achalasia.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Guillaumot; Chloé Léandri; Sarah Leblanc; Romain Coriat; Frédéric Prat; Stanislas Chaussade; Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Functional morphology of the lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm determined by three-dimensional high-resolution esophago-gastric junction pressure profile and CT imaging.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal; Ali Zifan; Dushyant Kumar; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Erika Ruppert; Gary Ghahremani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Esophagogastric junction morphology and contractile integral on high-resolution manometry in asymptomatic healthy volunteers: An international multicenter study.

Authors:  Benjamin D Rogers; Arvind Rengarajan; Luiz Abrahao; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Daniel Cisternas; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Jamal Hayat; Osamu Kawamura; Yeung Yeh Lee; Ana Maria Leguizamo; Ans Pauwels; Julio Perez de la Serna; Rosa I Ramos; Jose Maria Remes-Troche; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Jordi Serra; Daniel Sifrim; Salvatore Tolone; Zhiqin Wong; Frank Zerbib; John Pandolfino; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 5.  Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Peter J Kahrilas; Edoardo Savarino; Frank Zerbib; Francois Mion; André J P M Smout; Michael Vaezi; Daniel Sifrim; Mark R Fox; Marcelo F Vela; Radu Tutuian; Jan Tack; Albert J Bredenoord; John Pandolfino; Sabine Roman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 23.059

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.