Literature DB >> 24460814

Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ-Contractile Integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non-responders.

F Nicodème1, M Pipa-Muniz, K Khanna, P J Kahrilas, J E Pandolfino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite its obvious pathophysiological relevance, the clinical utility of measures of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) contractility is unsubstantiated. High-resolution manometry (HRM) may improve upon this with its inherent ability to integrate the magnitude of contractility over time and length of the EGJ. This study aimed to develop a novel HRM metric summarizing EGJ contractility and test its ability distinguish among subgroups of proton pump inhibitor non-responders (PPI-NRs).
METHODS: 75 normal controls and 88 PPI-NRs were studied. All underwent HRM. PPI-NRs underwent pH-impedance monitoring on PPI therapy scored in terms of acid exposure, number of reflux events, and reflux-symptom correlation and grouped as meeting all criteria, some criteria, or no criteria of abnormality. Control HRM studies were used to establish normal values for candidate EGJ contractility metrics, which were then compared in their ability to differentiate among PPI-NR subgroups. KEY
RESULTS: The EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), a metric integrating contractility across the EGJ for three respiratory cycles, best distinguished the All Criteria PPI-NR subgroup from controls and other PPI-NR subgroups. Normal values (median, [IQR]) for this measure were 39 mmHg-cm [25-55 mmHg-cm]. The correlation between the EGJ-CI and a previously proposed metric, the lower esophageal sphincter-pressure integral, that used a fixed 10 s time frame and an atmospheric as opposed to gastric pressure reference was weak. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Among HRM metrics tested, the EGJ-CI was best in distinguishing PPI-NRs meeting all criteria of abnormality on pH-impedance testing. Future prospective studies are required to explore its utility in management of broader groups of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EGJ contractile integral; GERD; high-resolution manometry

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24460814      PMCID: PMC4605557          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  14 in total

Review 1.  AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Role of the lower esophageal sphincter on acid exposure revisited with high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Masato Hoshino; Abhishek Sundaram; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Sphincterlike thoracoabdominal high pressure zone after esophagogastrectomy.

Authors:  W A Klein; H P Parkman; D T Dempsey; R S Fisher
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings.

Authors:  D Sifrim; R Holloway; J Silny; Z Xin; J Tack; A Lerut; J Janssens
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  High-resolution manometry of the EGJ: an analysis of crural diaphragm function in GERD.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Hyon Kim; Sudip K Ghosh; John O Clarke; Qing Zhang; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Gastroesophageal pressure gradients in gastroesophageal reflux disease: relations with hiatal hernia, body mass index, and esophageal acid exposure.

Authors:  Durk R de Vries; Margot A van Herwaarden; André J P M Smout; Melvin Samsom
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika A Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 4.052

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  What Is the Impact of High-Resolution Manometry in the Functional Diagnostic Workup of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?

Authors:  Jutta Keller
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-12

2.  Interrogation of esophagogastric junction barrier function using the esophagogastric junction contractile integral: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  P Gor; Y Li; S Munigala; A Patel; A Bolkhir; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 3.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Joanne Li Shen Ooi; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

Review 4.  Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of GERD: New Tricks for an Old Disease.

Authors:  Rishi D Naik; Lauren Evers; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03

Review 5.  High-resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.287

6.  Esophagogastric Junction Morphology and Distal Esophageal Acid Exposure.

Authors:  Shunsuke Akimoto; Saurabh Singhal; Takahiro Masuda; Se Ryung Yamamoto; Wendy Jo Svetanoff; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The association between systemic sclerosis disease manifestations and esophageal high-resolution manometry parameters.

Authors:  J N Kimmel; D A Carlson; M Hinchcliff; M A Carns; K A Aren; J Lee; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  High-Resolution Impedance Manometry Metrics of the Esophagogastric Junction for the Assessment of Treatment Response in Achalasia.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Zhiyue Lin; Peter J Kahrilas; Joel Sternbach; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper; Michelle Balla; Zoe Listernick; Michael Tye; Katherine Ritter; Jenna Craft; Jody D Ciolino; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  A modified Nissen fundoplication: subjective and objective midterm results.

Authors:  Sabrina Rampado; Edoardo Savarino; Angelica Ganss; Giulia Pozza; Romeo Bardini
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Ineffective esophageal motility phenotypes following fundoplication in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M D Mello; A R Shriver; Y Li; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.