Literature DB >> 33373111

Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©.

Rena Yadlapati1, Peter J Kahrilas2, Mark R Fox3,4, Albert J Bredenoord5, C Prakash Gyawali6, Sabine Roman7,8, Arash Babaei9, Ravinder K Mittal1,10, Nathalie Rommel11, Edoardo Savarino12, Daniel Sifrim13, André Smout5, Michael F Vaezi14, Frank Zerbib15, Junichi Akiyama16, Shobna Bhatia17, Serhat Bor18, Dustin A Carlson2, Joan W Chen19, Daniel Cisternas20, Charles Cock21, Enrique Coss-Adame22, Nicola de Bortoli23, Claudia Defilippi24, Ronnie Fass25, Uday C Ghoshal26, Sutep Gonlachanvit27, Albis Hani28, Geoffrey S Hebbard29, Kee Wook Jung30, Philip Katz31, David A Katzka32, Abraham Khan33, Geoffrey Paul Kohn34, Adriana Lazarescu35, Johannes Lengliner36, Sumeet K Mittal37, Taher Omari38, Moo In Park39, Roberto Penagini40, Daniel Pohl41, Joel E Richter42, Jordi Serra43, Rami Sweis44, Jan Tack45, Roger P Tatum46, Radu Tutuian47,48, Marcelo F Vela49, Reuben K Wong50, Justin C Wu51, Yinglian Xiao52, John E Pandolfino2.   

Abstract

Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). Fifty-two diverse international experts separated into seven working subgroups utilized formal validated methodologies over two-years to develop CCv4.0. Key updates in CCv.4.0 consist of a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol that incorporates supine and upright test positions as well as provocative testing, a refined definition of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO), more stringent diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and description of baseline EGJ metrics. Further, the CCv4.0 sought to define motility disorder diagnoses as conclusive and inconclusive based on associated symptoms, and findings on provocative testing as well as supportive testing with barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification and provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for patterns of disorders of peristalsis and obstruction at the EGJ.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achalasia; esophageal spasm; integrated relaxation pressure; lower esophageal sphincter; peroral endoscopic myotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33373111      PMCID: PMC8034247          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  92 in total

1.  Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Parameters for quantifying bolus retention with high-resolution impedance manometry.

Authors:  Z Lin; F Nicodème; C-Y Lin; B Mogni; L Friesen; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Chaotic peak propagation in patients with Jackhammer esophagus.

Authors:  Yinglian Xiao; Dustin A Carlson; Zhiyue Lin; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Optimal number of multiple rapid swallows needed during high-resolution esophageal manometry for accurate prediction of contraction reserve.

Authors:  A Mauro; E Savarino; N De Bortoli; S Tolone; D Pugliese; M Franchina; C P Gyawali; R Penagini
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Fragmented and failed swallows on esophageal high-resolution manometry associate with abnormal reflux burden better than weak swallows.

Authors:  Benjamin D Rogers; Arvind Rengarajan; Aurelio Mauro; Matteo Ghisa; Nicola De Bortoli; Michele Cicala; Mentore Ribolsi; Roberto Penagini; Edoardo Savarino; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Esophagogastric junction and esophageal body contraction metrics on high-resolution manometry predict esophageal acid burden.

Authors:  A Rengarajan; A Bolkhir; P Gor; D Wang; S Munigala; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry.

Authors:  William J Bulsiewicz; Peter J Kahrilas; Monika A Kwiatek; Sudip K Ghosh; Albert Meek; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on manometry: Outcomes and lack of benefit from CT and EUS.

Authors:  Andy Liu; Matthew Woo; Yasmin Nasser; Milli Gupta; Michelle C Buresi; Michael Curley; Dorothy Y Li; Lynn Wilsack; Christopher N Andrews
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  High-Resolution Manometry Thresholds and Motor Patterns Among Asymptomatic Individuals.

Authors:  Arvind Rengarajan; Benjamin D Rogers; Zhiqin Wong; Salvatore Tolone; Daniel Sifrim; Jordi Serra; Edoardo Savarino; Sabine Roman; Jose M Remes-Troche; Rosa Ramos; Julio Perez de la Serna; Ans Pauwels; Ana Maria Leguizamo; Yeong Yeh Lee; Osamu Kawamura; Jamal Hayat; Albis Hani; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Daniel Cisternas; Dustin Carlson; Serhat Bor; Shobna Bhatia; Luiz Abrahao; John Pandolfino; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  70 in total

1.  Assessment and management of dysphagia and achalasia.

Authors:  Amir Mari; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Ineffective esophageal motility in Chicago Classification version 4.0 better predicts abnormal acid exposure.

Authors:  Qian-Jun Zhuang; Nian-di Tan; Meng-Yu Zhang; Song-Feng Chen; Yu Luo; Ying-Lian Xiao
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.230

Review 3.  Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Achalasia.

Authors:  Wojciech Blonski; Samuel Slone; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  Achalasia.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Shobna Bhatia; Sabine Roman; Daniel Sifrim; Jan Tack; Sarah K Thompson; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 52.329

5.  Myotomy technique and esophageal contractility impact blown-out myotomy formation in achalasia: an in silico investigation.

Authors:  Sourav Halder; Shashank Acharya; Wenjun Kou; Ryan A J Campagna; Joseph R Triggs; Dustin A Carlson; Abdul Aziz Aadam; Eric S Hungness; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.052

6.  Validation of secondary peristalsis classification using FLIP panometry in 741 subjects undergoing manometry.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Alexandra J Baumann; Jacqueline E Prescott; Erica N Donnan; Rena Yadlapati; Abraham Khan; C Prakash Gyawali; Wenjun Kou; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Kelli DeLay; Rena Yadlapati; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-19

8.  The patient characteristics of esophageal carcinoma following laparoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Masato Hoshino; Se-Ryung Yamamoto; Shunsuke Akimoto; Takahiro Masuda; Yuki Sakashita; Naoko Fukushima; Hideyuki Kashiwagi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.

Authors:  Mark R Fox; Rami Sweis; Rena Yadlapati; John Pandolfino; Albis Hani; Claudia Defilippi; Tack Jan; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Multifactorial dysphagia: Azygos vein aneurysm (AVA) and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO).

Authors:  Scott Morton; Andrew D Grubic; Shahin Ayazi; Satish C Muluk; Hiran C Fernando; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.