Literature DB >> 23729229

FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.

M J Denters1, M Deutekom, M L Essink-Bot, P M Bossuyt, P Fockens, E Dekker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Screening programs for colorectal cancer aim at reducing cancer mortality. We assessed psychological effects of being invited to an immunochemical fecal test (FIT)-based screening program.
METHODS: Asymptomatic persons aged 50-74 years were invited to a Dutch screening pilot. The Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ) was used to measure the psychological effects of screening. Screen positives had two additional measurements: before undergoing the colonoscopy and 4 weeks after receiving the colonoscopy findings.
RESULTS: A number of 3,828 invitees (46 % male, mean age 60 years) completed the first PCQ. FIT positives had a higher mean total PCQ score (8.32, SD 8.84; score range 0-36) than those who declined participation (3.72, SD 6.30); participants still waiting for their FIT result had a mean score of 2.74 (SD 5.11), and those with a negative FIT result had the lowest score (2.06, SD 4.43) (p < 0.001). In the 373 FIT positives who underwent colonoscopy, 195 completed the pre-colonoscopy questionnaire and 253, the post-colonoscopy questionnaire. Mean total, physical, and social PCQ scores had decreased significantly between the first questionnaire and the pre-colonoscopy one, but scores on the emotional subscale did not. In false-positives, mean total, physical, and emotional PCQ scores decreased significantly, while in true-positives, a significant decrease in mean emotional PCQ score was observed.
CONCLUSION: Psychological consequences for invitees to a Dutch FIT-based colorectal cancer screening pilot differ, depending on timing and FIT result. FIT positives are more distressed than FIT negatives. FIT positives still experience psychological distress 6 weeks after a normal colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23729229     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1867-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  18 in total

1.  Psychological distress following fecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening--a population-based study.

Authors:  Klaus Brasso; Steen Ladelund; Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen; Torben Jørgensen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Psychologic distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening.

Authors:  J B Lowe; K P Balanda; C Del Mar; E Hawes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Women with false positive screening mammograms: how do they cope?

Authors:  P Olsson; K Armelius; G Nordahl; P Lenner; G Westman
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review.

Authors:  J Brett; C Bankhead; B Henderson; E Watson; J Austoker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Alice R Richman; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  F J Gilbert; C M Cordiner; I R Affleck; D B Hood; D Mathieson; L G Walker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Worry associated with screening for colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  E Lindholm; B Berglund; J Kewenter; E Haglind
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.

Authors:  J Brett; J Austoker
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2001-12

9.  Anxiety and borderline PAP smear results.

Authors:  Ida J Korfage; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Hans Huveneers; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial.

Authors:  Mary B Barton; Debra S Morley; Sara Moore; Jennifer D Allen; Ken P Kleinman; Karen M Emmons; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  15 in total

1.  Primary care visit use after positive fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Christopher D Jensen; Wei K Zhao; Alfred I Neugut; Benjamin Lebwohl; Jasmin A Tiro; Lawrence H Kushi; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Clasine M de Klerk; Lisanne M Vendrig; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Reasons For Lack of Follow-up Colonoscopy Among Persons With A Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Diego Llovet; Mardie Serenity; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Caroline A Bravo; Bronwen R McCurdy; Catherine Dubé; Nancy N Baxter; Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck; Amanda Peters; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Benedicte Kirkøen; Paula Berstad; Edoardo Botteri; Tone Lise Åvitsland; Alvilde Maria Ossum; Thomas de Lange; Geir Hoff; Tomm Bernklev
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Are Hemorrhoids Associated with False-Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results?

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Chong Il Sohn; Kyuyong Choi; Yoon Suk Jung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants vs individuals not invited.

Authors:  Benedicte Kirkøen; Paula Berstad; Edoardo Botteri; Linn Bernklev; Badboni El-Safadi; Geir Hoff; Thomas de Lange; Tomm Bernklev
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  High test positivity and low positive predictive value for colorectal cancer of continued faecal occult blood test screening after negative colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jeremy P Brown; Kate Wooldrage; Suzanne Wright; Claire Nickerson; Amanda J Cross; Wendy S Atkin
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Predictive Modeling of Colonoscopic Findings in a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Jade Law; Anand Rajan; Harry Trieu; John Azizian; Rani Berry; Simon W Beaven; James H Tabibian
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.487

9.  Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?

Authors:  Eunate Arana-Arri; Isabel Idigoras; Begoña Uranga; Raquel Pérez; Ana Irurzun; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Callum G Fraser; Isabel Portillo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Nina C A Vermeer; Maxime J M van der Valk; Heleen S Snijders; Hans F A Vasen; Arthur Gerritsen van der Hoop; Onno R Guicherit; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Anne M Stiggelbout; Koen C M J Peeters
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.