Literature DB >> 15786514

The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review.

J Brett1, C Bankhead, B Henderson, E Watson, J Austoker.   

Abstract

Concerns have been raised regarding the possible negative psychological impact of the cancer screening programmes offered in the UK. This review aims to assess the extent of and factors associated with the adverse psychological consequences of mammographic screening. Fifty-four papers from 13 countries were identified, a majority of which were published after 1990, coinciding more or less with the onset of routine mammographic screening. The results report that mammographic screening does not appear to create anxiety in women who are given a clear result after a mammogram and are subsequently placed on routine recall. However, women who have further investigations following their routine mammogram experience significant anxiety in the short term, and possibly in the long term. The nature and extent of the further investigation that women are exposed to during mammographic screening determines the intensity of the psychological impact. Factors associated with the adverse psychological impact of mammographic screening included: social demographic factors of younger age, lower education, living in urban areas, manual occupation, and one or no children; cancer screening factors of dissatisfaction with information and communication during screening process, waiting time between recall letter and recall appointment, pain experienced during the mammographic screening procedures, and previous false positive result; and cancer worry factors including fear of cancer and greater perceived risk of breast cancer. Difficulties in measuring the psychological impact of screening are discussed, and methods of alleviating the negative psychological outcomes are suggested. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15786514     DOI: 10.1002/pon.904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  74 in total

1.  Developing a utility decision framework to evaluate predictive models in breast cancer risk estimation.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Craig K Abbey; Xianqiao Chen; Jie Liu; David C Page; Oguzhan Alagoz; Peggy Peissig; Adedayo A Onitilo; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-08-17

2.  Using semi-Markov processes to study timeliness and tests used in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast cancer.

Authors:  R A Hubbard; J Lange; Y Zhang; B A Salim; J R Stroud; L Y T Inoue
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  2008 update of the guideline: early detection of breast cancer in Germany.

Authors:  Ute-Susann Albert; Helmut Altland; Volker Duda; Jutta Engel; Max Geraedts; Syvia Heywang-Köbrunner; Dieter Hölzel; Eva Kalbheim; Michael Koller; Klaus König; Rolf Kreienberg; Thorsten Kühn; Annette Lebeau; Irmgard Nass-Griegoleit; Werner Schlake; Rita Schmutzler; Ingrid Schreer; Hilde Schulte; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Uwe Wagner; Ina Kopp
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Screening Mammography Among Older Women: A Review of United States Guidelines and Potential Harms.

Authors:  Deborah S Mack; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Organization Communication Factors and Abnormal Mammogram Follow-up: a Qualitative Study Among Ethnically Diverse Women Across Three Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Jazmine D Kenny; Leah S Karliner; Karla Kerlikowske; Celia P Kaplan; Ana Fernandez-Lamothe; Nancy J Burke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Breast cancer worry among women awaiting mammography: is it unfounded? Does prior counseling help?

Authors:  Susan K Steinemann; Maria B J Chun; Dustin H Huynh; Katherine Loui
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-07

7.  Psychological impact of breast cancer screening in Japan.

Authors:  Atsuko Kitano; Hideko Yamauchi; Takashi Hosaka; Hiroshi Yagata; Keiko Hosokawa; Sachiko Ohde; Seigo Nakamura; Masafumi Takimoto; Hiroko Tsunoda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.

Authors:  Mackenzie S Fuller; Christoph I Lee; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.456

9.  Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Dennis G Fryback; Cristina S Hammond; Lucy G Hanna; Margaret R Grove; Mary Brown; Qianfei Wang; Karen Lindfors; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results.

Authors:  Simon Craddock Lee; Robin T Higashi; Joanne M Sanders; Hong Zhu; Stephen J Inrig; Caroline Mejias; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.