Literature DB >> 10091796

Psychologic distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening.

J B Lowe1, K P Balanda, C Del Mar, E Hawes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to explore the psychologic morbidity of women recalled for diagnostic assessment during population-based mammographic screening.
METHODS: This study prospectively attempted to measure physical, social, and emotional well-being by the administration of a questionnaire before screening, at the time of recall; and 1 month later to women recalled and matched women with those not recalled.
RESULTS: Of the 224 women who were recalled for further diagnostic assessment and their matches, complete follow-up was obtained on 182 pairs (81.3%). In contrast to those women not recalled, recalled women exhibited increased levels of concern at the time of recall. These levels had not decreased to the initial level after 1 month, even though breast carcinoma was not diagnosed. Similar negative short term effects also were evident in the areas of physical well-being, social functioning, and anxiety and insomnia levels, although these were not sustained.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with normal results after mass mammographic breast screening experienced no increase in psychologic distress and a decrease in their concern regarding breast carcinoma. However, those women who were recalled to follow-up after abnormal findings experienced an increase in their level of concern regarding breast carcinoma and this concern was sustained, as determined by repeat questionnaire, 1 month after a negative result had been determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10091796     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1114::aid-cncr15>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

1.  Women should be fully informed of the potential benefits and harms before screening mammography.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; V L Ernster
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-11

Review 2.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Psychological distress, social withdrawal, and coping following receipt of an abnormal mammogram among different ethnicities: a mediation model.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Noah Espinoza; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Measuring psychological consequences of screening: adaptation of the psychological consequences questionnaire into Dutch.

Authors:  A J Rijnsburger; M L Essink-Bot; E van As; J Cockburn; H J de Koning
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Psychological impact of breast cancer screening in Japan.

Authors:  Atsuko Kitano; Hideko Yamauchi; Takashi Hosaka; Hiroshi Yagata; Keiko Hosokawa; Sachiko Ohde; Seigo Nakamura; Masafumi Takimoto; Hiroko Tsunoda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result.

Authors:  R C Macefield; C Metcalfe; J A Lane; J L Donovan; K N L Avery; J M Blazeby; L Down; D E Neal; F C Hamdy; K Vedhara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Hanne Thorsen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

8.  The effect of immediate reading of screening mammograms on medical care utilization and costs after false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Kate A Stewart; Peter J Neumann; Suzanne W Fletcher; Mary B Barton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.

Authors:  M J Denters; M Deutekom; M L Essink-Bot; P M Bossuyt; P Fockens; E Dekker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Online support: Impact on anxiety in women who experience an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  Eniola T Obadina; Lori L Dubenske; Helene E McDowell; Amy K Atwood; Deborah K Mayer; Ryan W Woods; David H Gustafson; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.