Literature DB >> 19683428

Anxiety and borderline PAP smear results.

Ida J Korfage1, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Hans Huveneers, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Low-grade abnormalities after cervical cancer screening, i.e. borderline (Pap 2) or mildly (Pap 3a1) dyskaryotic (BMD) smear results, are found in considerable numbers of women annually. We compared quality of life and anxiety in women with BMD and a reference group of screening participants who were awaiting smear taking.
METHODS: Five hundred and fifty women with BMD in the preceding 6-24 months, identified through a regional screening organisation, were sent a questionnaire addressing generic quality of life (12-item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-12], EuroQol classification [EQ-5D]), generic anxiety (STAI-6) and screen-specific anxiety (Psychological Consequences Questionnaire [PCQ]).
RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in background characteristics, women with BMD (n=270) reported more generic anxiety (44.4 versus 32.6) and screen-specific anxiety (5.0 versus 1.4) than the reference group (n=352). The differences indicated statistical (p<0.001) and clinical significance. High anxiety (STAI-6>44) was reported by 49% of the BMD group. Mental quality of life was worse in the BMD than in the reference group (44.2 versus 52.0, p<0.001). The BMD group considered screening more often frightening (27% versus 10%) and reported 'fear for cervical cancer' more frequently as their reason for having a (repeat) smear taken (62/270, 23% versus 12/346, 4%). CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: BMD smears were consistently associated with considerable excess anxiety in the period of 6-24 months after the original BMD Pap smears had been taken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19683428     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  10 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D in the prevention, screening and management of cervical disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  A Ó Céilleachair; J F O'Mahony; M O'Connor; J O'Leary; C Normand; C Martin; L Sharp
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Psychological impact of positive cervical cancer screening results among Japanese women.

Authors:  Yukari Isaka; Haruhiko Inada; Yuri Hiranuma; Masao Ichikawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Test Performance of Cervical Cytology Among Adults With vs Without Human Papillomavirus Vaccination.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Gwiwon Nam; Danielle A Aase; Ruby Russell; Genevieve B Melton; Shalini Kulasingam; Rachel I Vogel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.

Authors:  M J Denters; M Deutekom; M L Essink-Bot; P M Bossuyt; P Fockens; E Dekker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Psychosocial impact of alternative management policies for low-grade cervical abnormalities: results from the TOMBOLA randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; Seonaidh Cotton; Julian Little; Nicola M Gray; Margaret Cruickshank; Louise Smart; Alison Thornton; Norman Waugh; Leslie Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  HPV mRNA is more specific than HPV DNA in triage of women with minor cervical lesions.

Authors:  Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye; Silje Fismen; Tore Jarl Gutteberg; Elin Synnøve Mortensen; Finn Egil Skjeldestad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validity and reliability of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Danish women aged 45 years and older with abnormal cervical screening results.

Authors:  L W Gustafson; P Gabel; A Hammer; H H Lauridsen; L K Petersen; B Andersen; P Bor; M B Larsen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Alleviating psychological distress associated with a positive cervical cancer screening result: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Yukari Isaka; Ai Hori; Rie Tanaka; Masao Ichikawa
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Quality of life in participants of a CRC screening program.

Authors:  A Kapidzic; I J Korfage; L van Dam; A H C van Roon; J C I Y Reijerink; A G Zauber; M van Ballegooijen; E J Kuipers; M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Pernille Thordal Larsen; Susanne Fogh Jørgensen; Mette Tranberg; Sisse Helle Njor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.