Literature DB >> 20443744

Psychological distress following fecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening--a population-based study.

Klaus Brasso1, Steen Ladelund, Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen, Torben Jørgensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible psychological side-effect of participating in a colorectal cancer (CRC)-screening program.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred participants in a Danish CRC screening feasibility study were invited to complete a short version of the SCL92 (symptom check list) questionnaire relating to the domains: anxiety, depression and somatization following information on the result of their fecal occult blood test. The questionnaire was repeated after 3 and 12 months. Results were analyzed according to age, gender and test result.
RESULTS: Participation rate was high, 84.5% at entry, and declined only slightly. The decline was not related to test results nor initial results from the questionnaire. At entry, scores in each dimension in the study population were similar to expected scores in the background population. Participants tested positive at entry had significantly higher scores in all three domains, this difference disappeared at 12 months follow-up. Men had declining scores in all three domains at 3 and 12 months follow-up, whereas women had declining scores only in the domain anxiety. Identical patterns in changes in scoring were found regardless of age and gender. Participants tested positive had, regardless of later results of diagnostic work-up, declining scores during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the limitations of the study, the results demonstrate no adverse effect on psychological well-being within 12 months following CRC screening regardless of age, gender or test result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443744     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2010.485355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  17 in total

1.  Primary care visit use after positive fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Christopher D Jensen; Wei K Zhao; Alfred I Neugut; Benjamin Lebwohl; Jasmin A Tiro; Lawrence H Kushi; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The role of genetic predisposition in cardiovascular risk after cancer diagnosis: a matched cohort study of the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Huazhen Yang; Yu Zeng; Wenwen Chen; Yajing Sun; Yao Hu; Zhiye Ying; Junren Wang; Yuanyuan Qu; Fang Fang; Unnur A Valdimarsdóttir; Huan Song
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 9.075

3.  False negative fecal occult blood test may be associated with increased mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Half; Liat Mlynarsky; Timna Naftali; Fabiana Benjaminov; Fred M Konikoff
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.

Authors:  M J Denters; M Deutekom; M L Essink-Bot; P M Bossuyt; P Fockens; E Dekker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system.

Authors:  Sharon S Laing; Andy Bogart; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Screening for colorectal cancer: possible improvements by risk assessment evaluation?

Authors:  Hans J Nielsen; Karen V Jakobsen; Ib J Christensen; Nils Brünner
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience.

Authors:  A Bobridge; P Bampton; S Cole; H Lewis; G Young
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Benedicte Kirkøen; Paula Berstad; Edoardo Botteri; Tone Lise Åvitsland; Alvilde Maria Ossum; Thomas de Lange; Geir Hoff; Tomm Bernklev
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants vs individuals not invited.

Authors:  Benedicte Kirkøen; Paula Berstad; Edoardo Botteri; Linn Bernklev; Badboni El-Safadi; Geir Hoff; Thomas de Lange; Tomm Bernklev
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Quality of life in participants of a CRC screening program.

Authors:  A Kapidzic; I J Korfage; L van Dam; A H C van Roon; J C I Y Reijerink; A G Zauber; M van Ballegooijen; E J Kuipers; M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.