Literature DB >> 10444727

Women with false positive screening mammograms: how do they cope?

P Olsson1, K Armelius, G Nordahl, P Lenner, G Westman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long term psychological impact on women who were recalled for further investigation after mammography screening and to find any factors that might predict coping ability in order to identify those subjects who require additional support at an earlier stage.
SETTING: Counties of Västerbotten and Västernorrland, Sweden.
METHODS: A prospective design was used in which 252 recalled women completed questionnaires twice--once within a week of having received the all-clear and again at follow up six months later. A group of 1104 randomly selected, screen negative women were followed up in the same way for comparison. The questionnaire included the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ) and basic sociodemographic data. The main outcome measure was the total score on the PCQ at six months.
RESULTS: Of the 252 women, 235 (93%) completed both questionnaires. In the control group, 987 (89.4%) women responded. Six months after the all-clear, recalled women were still significantly more anxious (p < 0.001) than those who had been screened but not recalled. The strongest predictor of psychological distress at six months was the PCQ score at the first measurement. Other predictors were a low level of education, living in high density urban areas, and having only one child or no children at all. Widows appeared to cope better than other women.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to define a group of women with false positive results who are already at risk of coping less effectively at the time of recall. Offering these women counselling or other types of support should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10444727     DOI: 10.1136/jms.6.2.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  11 in total

1.  Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.

Authors:  M B Barton; S Moore; S Polk; E Shtatland; J G Elmore; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Rebecca A Silliman; Long H Ngo; Robyn L Birdwell; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Jessica Donato; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Moderators of psychological recovery from benign cancer screening results.

Authors:  M Pelletier; B Knäuper; C G Loiselle; R Perreault; C Mizrahi; L Dubé
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.

Authors:  M J Denters; M Deutekom; M L Essink-Bot; P M Bossuyt; P Fockens; E Dekker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Online support: Impact on anxiety in women who experience an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  Eniola T Obadina; Lori L Dubenske; Helene E McDowell; Amy K Atwood; Deborah K Mayer; Ryan W Woods; David H Gustafson; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Measuring the psychological consequences of breast cancer screening: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire.

Authors:  Andrew Cooper; Helen Aucote
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Psychological distress and quality of life following provision of vascular imaging results of the coronary and carotid arteries to asymptomatic adults: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Joshua R Lewis; Mandy Stanley; Reindolf Anokye; Ben Jackson; James Dimmock; Joanne M Dickson; Lauren C Blekkenhorst; Jonathan M Hodgson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-11-26

8.  Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer.

Authors:  Jenny McCann; Diane Stockton; Sara Godward
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Affects of Anxiety and Depression on Health-Related Quality of Life among Patients with Benign Breast Lumps Diagnosed via Ultrasonography in China.

Authors:  Zhe Lou; Yinyan Li; Yilong Yang; Lie Wang; Jun Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Patient-reported impacts of a conservative management programme for the clinically inapparent adrenal mass.

Authors:  Andreas Muth; Charles Taft; Lilian Hammarstedt; Lena Björneld; Mikael Hellström; Bo Wängberg
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.