Literature DB >> 21360361

Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modelling.

Daniel P Nicolella1, Todd L Bredbenner.   

Abstract

Skeletal fractures associated with bone mass loss are a major clinical problem and economic burden, and lead to significant morbidity and mortality in the ageing population. Clinical image-based measures of bone mass show only moderate correlative strength with bone strength. However, engineering models derived from clinical image data predict bone strength with significantly greater accuracy. Currently, image-based finite element (FE) models are time consuming to construct and are non-parametric. The goal of this study was to develop a parametric proximal femur FE model based on a statistical shape and density model (SSDM) derived from clinical image data. A small number of independent SSDM parameters described the shape and bone density distribution of a set of cadaver femurs and captured the variability affecting proximal femur FE strength predictions. Finally, a three-dimensional FE model of an 'unknown' femur was reconstructed from the SSDM with an average spatial error of 0.016 mm and an average bone density error of 0.037 g/cm(3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21360361      PMCID: PMC3116933          DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.515984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  54 in total

1.  An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models.

Authors:  Fulvia Taddei; Alberto Pancanti; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture.

Authors:  Pasi Pulkkinen; Juha Partanen; Pekka Jalovaara; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration.

Authors:  Daniel Rueckert; Alejandro F Frangi; Julia A Schnabel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: an in vitro study.

Authors:  A D Tabensky; J Williams; V DeLuca; E Briganti; E Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Advances in the noninvasive assessment of bone density, quality, and structure.

Authors:  H K Genant; T F Lang; K Engelke; T Fuerst; C Glüer; S Majumdar; M Jergas
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone.

Authors:  T S Keller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method.

Authors:  J H Keyak; J M Meagher; H B Skinner; C D Mote
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-09

8.  Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.

Authors:  J C Lotz; E J Cheal; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  C M Les; J H Keyak; S M Stover; K T Taylor; A J Kaneps
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: implications for osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  J C Lotz; E J Cheal; W C Hayes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Structural and functional maturation of distal femoral cartilage and bone during postnatal development and growth in humans and mice.

Authors:  Elaine F Chan; Ricky Harjanto; Hiroshi Asahara; Nozomu Inoue; Koichi Masuda; William D Bugbee; Gary S Firestein; Harish S Hosalkar; Martin K Lotz; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications.

Authors:  Anupama Goparaju; Krithika Iyer; Alexandre Bône; Nan Hu; Heath B Henninger; Andrew E Anderson; Stanley Durrleman; Matthijs Jacxsens; Alan Morris; Ibolya Csecs; Nassir Marrouche; Shireen Y Elhabian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  Computational anatomy in the study of bone structure.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Fracture risk predictions based on statistical shape and density modeling of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Todd L Bredbenner; Robert L Mason; Lorena M Havill; Eric S Orwoll; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Development and validation of a statistical shape modeling-based finite element model of the cervical spine under low-level multiple direction loading conditions.

Authors:  Todd L Bredbenner; Travis D Eliason; W Loren Francis; John M McFarland; Andrew C Merkle; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-27

Review 7.  Analysis of Uncertainty and Variability in Finite Element Computational Models for Biomedical Engineering: Characterization and Propagation.

Authors:  Nerea Mangado; Gemma Piella; Jérôme Noailly; Jordi Pons-Prats; Miguel Ángel González Ballester
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-07

8.  Finite Element Study of a Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Nucleus Replacement Device.

Authors:  Jessica S Coogan; W Loren Francis; Travis D Eliason; Todd L Bredbenner; Brian D Stemper; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-01

9.  Focal osteoporosis defects play a key role in hip fracture.

Authors:  Kenneth E S Poole; Linda Skingle; Andrew H Gee; Thomas D Turmezei; Fjola Johannesdottir; Karen Blesic; Collette Rose; Madhavi Vindlacheruvu; Simon Donell; Jan Vaculik; Pavel Dungl; Martin Horak; Jan J Stepan; Jonathan Reeve; Graham M Treece
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The impact of shape uncertainty on aortic-valve pressure-drop computations.

Authors:  M J M M Hoeijmakers; W Huberts; M C M Rutten; F N van de Vosse
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.