Literature DB >> 31240508

Hip Fracture Discrimination Based on Statistical Multi-parametric Modeling (SMPM).

Julio Carballido-Gamio1, Aihong Yu2, Ling Wang2, Yongbin Su2, Andrew J Burghardt3, Thomas F Lang3, Xiaoguang Cheng2.   

Abstract

Studies using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and data-driven image analysis techniques have shown that trabecular and cortical volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) can improve the hip fracture prediction of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry areal BMD (aBMD). Here, we hypothesize that (1) QCT imaging features of shape, density and structure derived from data-driven image analysis techniques can improve the hip fracture discrimination of classification models based on mean femoral neck aBMD (Neck.aBMD), and (2) that data-driven cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th) features can improve the hip fracture discrimination of vBMD models. We tested our hypotheses using statistical multi-parametric modeling (SMPM) in a QCT study of acute hip fracture of 50 controls and 93 fragility fracture cases. SMPM was used to extract features of shape, vBMD, Ct.Th, cortical vBMD, and vBMD in a layer adjacent to the endosteal surface to develop hip fracture classification models with machine learning logistic LASSO. The performance of these classification models was evaluated in two aspects: (1) their hip fracture classification capability without Neck.aBMD, and (2) their capability to improve the hip fracture classification of the Neck.aBMD model. Assessments were done with 10-fold cross-validation, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), differences of AUCs, and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index. All LASSO models including SMPM-vBMD features, and the majority of models including SMPM-Ct.Th features performed significantly better than the Neck.aBMD model; and all SMPM features significantly improved the hip fracture discrimination of the Neck.aBMD model (Hypothesis 1). An interesting finding was that SMPM-features of vBMD also captured Ct.Th patterns, potentially explaining the superior classification performance of models based on SMPM-vBMD features (Hypothesis 2). Age, height and weight had a small impact on model performances, and the model of shape, vBMD and Ct.Th consistently yielded better performances than the Neck.aBMD models. Results of this study clearly support the relevance of bone density and quality on the assessment of hip fracture, and demonstrate their potential on patient and healthcare cost benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density (BMD); Cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th); Fracture; Hip; Quantitative computed tomography (QCT); Statistical multi-parametric modeling (SMPM)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31240508      PMCID: PMC7012369          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-019-02298-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  43 in total

1.  Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS study. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  N J Crabtree; H Kroger; A Martin; H A P Pols; R Lorenc; J Nijs; J J Stepan; J A Falch; T Miazgowski; S Grazio; P Raptou; J Adams; A Collings; K T Khaw; N Rushton; M Lunt; A K Dixon; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Overview of recruitment for the osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS).

Authors:  Janet Babich Blank; Peggy Mannen Cawthon; Mary Lou Carrion-Petersen; Loretta Harper; J Phillip Johnson; Eileen Mitson; Romelia Ramírez Delay
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  The Influence of High-Impact Exercise on Cortical and Trabecular Bone Mineral Content and 3D Distribution Across the Proximal Femur in Older Men: A Randomized Controlled Unilateral Intervention.

Authors:  Sarah J Allison; Kenneth E S Poole; Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; Carol Tonkin; Winston J Rennie; Jonathan P Folland; Gregory D Summers; Katherine Brooke-Wavell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study: multidisciplinary applied phenomics.

Authors:  Tamara B Harris; Lenore J Launer; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Olafur Kjartansson; Palmi V Jonsson; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Thor Aspelund; Melissa E Garcia; Mary Frances Cotch; Howard J Hoffman; Vilmundur Gudnason
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Assessment of the individual fracture risk of the proximal femur by using statistical appearance models.

Authors:  Benedikt Schuler; Karl D Fritscher; Volker Kuhn; Felix Eckstein; Thomas M Link; Rainer Schubert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Roy Harnish; Isra Saeed; Timothy Streeper; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Terry M Therneau; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Xiaoguang Cheng; L Joseph Melton; Joyce Keyak; Vilmundur Gudnason; Sundeep Khosla; Tamara B Harris; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Odanacatib treatment affects trabecular and cortical bone in the femur of postmenopausal women: results of a two-year placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Thomas Fuerst; Bernard Dardzinski; John Kornak; Shabana Ather; Harry K Genant; Anne de Papp
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Active shape modeling of the hip in the prediction of incident hip fracture.

Authors:  Julie C Baker-LePain; Kali R Luker; John A Lynch; Neeta Parimi; Michael C Nevitt; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Can we improve the prediction of hip fracture by assessing bone structure using shape and appearance modelling?

Authors:  S R Goodyear; R J Barr; E McCloskey; S Alesci; R M Aspden; D M Reid; J S Gregory
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  6 in total

1.  Machine Learning Applications in Orthopaedic Imaging.

Authors:  Vincent M Wang; Carrie A Cheung; Albert J Kozar; Bert Huang
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Augmenting Osteoporosis Imaging with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Francesco Caliva; Galateia Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Economic evaluations of big data analytics for clinical decision-making: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lytske Bakker; Jos Aarts; Carin Uyl-de Groot; William Redekop
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: A scoping review.

Authors:  Simon J Federer; Gareth G Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Applications of Machine Learning in Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Sung Hye Kong; Chan Soo Shin
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2021-10-21

6.  Differences in Hip Geometry Between Female Subjects With and Without Acute Hip Fracture: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Minghui Yang; Yandong Liu; Yufeng Ge; Shiwen Zhu; Yongbin Su; Xiaoguang Cheng; Xinbao Wu; Glen M Blake; Klaus Engelke
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.