Literature DB >> 23715886

Dosimetric properties and commissioning of cone-beam CT image beam line with a carbon target.

Y Dzierma1, F G Nuesken, N P Licht, C Ruebe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Accurate patient positioning before radiotherapy is often verified using advanced imaging techniques such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Even for dedicated imaging beam lines, the applied dose is not necessarily negligible with respect to the treatment dose and should be considered in the treatment plan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study presents measurements of the beam properties of the Siemens kView (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany) image beam line (IBL) and the commissioning in the Philips Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system (TPS; Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
RESULTS: The percent depth dose curve reaches its maximum at a depth of 10 mm, with a surface dose of 44 %. The IBL operates in flattening filter-free mode, showing the characteristic dose falloff from the central axis. Stability over several days to months is within less than 2 % dose deviation or 1 mm distance-to-agreement. Modelling of the IBL beam line was performed using the Pinnacle(3) automatic modelling routine, with absolute dosimetric verification and film measurements of the fluence distribution.
CONCLUSION: After commissioning of the IBL beam model, the dose from the imaging IBL CBCT can be calculated. Even if the absolute dose deposited is small, repeated imaging doses may sum up to significant amounts and can shift the position of the dose maximum by several centimetres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23715886     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0330-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  26 in total

1.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Low dose megavoltage cone beam computed tomography with an unflattened 4 MV beam from a carbon target.

Authors:  Bruce A Faddegon; Vincent Wu; Jean Pouliot; Bijumon Gangadharan; Ali Bani-Hashemi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  kV cone-beam CT-based IGRT: a clinical review.

Authors:  Judit Boda-Heggemann; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Energy and angular distributions of photons from medical linear accelerators.

Authors:  R Mohan; C Chui; L Lidofsky
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Image quality improvement in megavoltage cone beam CT using an imaging beam line and a sintered pixelated array system.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Breitbach; Jonathan S Maltz; Bijumon Gangadharan; Ali Bani-Hashemi; Carryn M Anderson; Sudershan K Bhatia; Jared Stiles; Drake S Edwards; Ryan T Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Patient dose and image quality from mega-voltage cone beam computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Olivier Gayou; David S Parda; Mark Johnson; Moyed Miften
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A radiographic and tomographic imaging system integrated into a medical linear accelerator for localization of bone and soft-tissue targets.

Authors:  D A Jaffray; D G Drake; M Moreau; A A Martinez; J W Wong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Comparative study of a low-Z cone-beam computed tomography system.

Authors:  D A Roberts; V N Hansen; M G Thompson; G Poludniowski; A Niven; J Seco; P M Evans
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Megavoltage imaging with low Z targets: implementation and characterization of an investigational system.

Authors:  O Z Ostapiak; P F O'Brien; B A Faddegon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Image quality & dosimetric property of an investigational imaging beam line MV-CBCT.

Authors:  Chris Beltran; Renin Lukose; Bijumon Gangadharan; Ali Bani-Hashemi; Bruce A Faddegon
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  9 in total

1.  Hounsfield units variations: impact on CT-density based conversion tables and their effects on dose distribution.

Authors:  B Zurl; R Tiefling; P Winkler; P Kindl; K S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Comparison between manual and automatic image registration in image-guided radiation therapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography with an imaging beam line for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Hashido; Shinya Nakasone; Mari Fukao; Seiichi Ota; Shinichi Inoue
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  Image quality and dose distributions of three linac-based imaging modalities.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Evemarie Ames; Frank Nuesken; Jan Palm; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Influence of daily imaging on plan quality and normal tissue toxicity for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Katharina Bell; Marina Heitfeld; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe; Yvonne Dzierma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Patient specific methods for room-mounted x-ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring.

Authors:  M Tynan R Stevens; Dave D Parsons; James L Robar
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Imaging dose and secondary cancer risk in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Katharina Mikulla; Patrick Richter; Katharina Bell; Patrick Melchior; Frank Nuesken; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Image guidance and positioning accuracy in clinical practice: influence of positioning errors and imaging dose on the real dose distribution for head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Katharina Bell; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe; Yvonne Dzierma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Positioning errors of metal localization devices with motion artifacts on kV and MV cone beam CT.

Authors:  Teh Lin; Chang-Ming Charlie Ma
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-03-15

9.  Evaluation of IGRT-Induced Imaging Doses and Secondary Cancer Risk for SBRT Early Lung Cancer Patients In Silico Study.

Authors:  Yan-Hua Duan; Heng-Le Gu; Xiao-Hui Yang; Hua Chen; Hao Wang; Yan Shao; Xiao-Yang Li; Ai-Hui Feng; Yan-Chen Ying; Xiao-Long Fu; Kui Ma; Tao Zhou; Zhi-Yong Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.