Literature DB >> 17388167

Patient dose and image quality from mega-voltage cone beam computed tomography imaging.

Olivier Gayou1, David S Parda, Mark Johnson, Moyed Miften.   

Abstract

The evolution of ever more conformal radiation delivery techniques makes the subject of accurate localization of increasing importance in radiotherapy. Several systems can be utilized including kilo-voltage and mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography (MV-CBCT), CT on rail or helical tomography. One of the attractive aspects of mega-voltage cone-beam CT is that it uses the therapy beam along with an electronic portal imaging device to image the patient prior to the delivery of treatment. However, the use of a photon beam energy in the mega-voltage range for volumetric imaging degrades the image quality and increases the patient radiation dose. To optimize image quality and patient dose in MV-CBCT imaging procedures, a series of dose measurements in cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms using an ionization chamber, radiographic films, and thermoluminescent dosimeters was performed. Furthermore, the dependence of the contrast to noise ratio and spatial resolution of the image upon the dose delivered for a 20-cm-diam cylindrical phantom was evaluated. Depending on the anatomical site and patient thickness, we found that the minimum dose deposited in the irradiated volume was 5-9 cGy and the maximum dose was between 9 and 17 cGy for our clinical MV-CBCT imaging protocols. Results also demonstrated that for high contrast areas such as bony anatomy, low doses are sufficient for image registration and visualization of the three-dimensional boundaries between soft tissue and bony structures. However, as the difference in tissue density decreased, the dose required to identify soft tissue boundaries increased. Finally, the dose delivered by MV-CBCT was simulated using a treatment planning system (TPS), thereby allowing the incorporation of MV-CBCT dose in the treatment planning process. The TPS-calculated doses agreed well with measurements for a wide range of imaging protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17388167     DOI: 10.1118/1.2428407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Dosimetric integration of daily mega-voltage cone-beam CT for image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Zabel-du Bois; S Nill; S Ulrich; U Oelfke; B Rhein; P Haering; S Milker-Zabel; A Schwahofer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Dosimetric properties and commissioning of cone-beam CT image beam line with a carbon target.

Authors:  Y Dzierma; F G Nuesken; N P Licht; C Ruebe
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Assessment and evaluation of MV image guidance system performance in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nithya Kanakavelu; E James Jebaseelan Samuel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-02-07

4.  Comparison between manual and automatic image registration in image-guided radiation therapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography with an imaging beam line for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Hashido; Shinya Nakasone; Mari Fukao; Seiichi Ota; Shinichi Inoue
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-21

5.  [Organizational models of inpatient emergency and acute care].

Authors:  A Kaltwasser; C Dodt
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  Dosimetry challenges for implementing emerging technologies.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Yin; Mark Oldham; Jing Cai; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser       Date:  2010

7.  Image quality and dose distributions of three linac-based imaging modalities.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Evemarie Ames; Frank Nuesken; Jan Palm; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Set-up error validation with EPID images: Measurements vs Egs_cbct simulation.

Authors:  D van Eeden; F H J O'Reilly; F C P du Plessis
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-10-21

9.  Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose.

Authors:  Hassan S Abou-Elenein; Ehab M Attalla; H Ammar; Ismail Eldesoky; Mohamed Farouk; Mohamed S Zaghloul
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-10

10.  Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Kana Motegi; Ryosuke Kohno; Takashi Ueda; Toshiyuki Shibuya; Takaki Ariji; Mitsuhiko Kawashima; Tetsuo Akimoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.