Literature DB >> 18450400

Evaluation of Singh index for assessment of osteoporosis using digital radiography.

O Hauschild1, N Ghanem, M Oberst, T Baumann, P C Kreuz, M Langer, N P Suedkamp, P Niemeyer.   

Abstract

Evaluation of Singh index (SI) as a simple means for estimating bone mass on radiographs has been subject of numerous studies. All of these studies used plain film radiographs for assessment of SI. Digital radiography may improve validity and reliability of SI assessment. Aim of this study was to evaluate SI gradings assessed on digital radiographs. Digital pelvic radiographs of 100 patients were graded using SI by five independent observers (two radiologists, three traumatologists) blinded to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results and re-graded by all observers for assessment of intraobserver agreement. SI was correlated with DXA measurements and after grouping the patients according to World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria (osteoporosis, osteopenia, normal). Logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify influential parameters on the SI grading process. Mean intraobserver agreement was 0.648+/-0.18 (Kendall's Tau) and 0.43+/-0.28 (kappa). Mean interobserver agreement was 0.488+/-0.193 (Kendall's Tau) and 0.199+/-0.248 (kappa). Mean correlation between SI and trochanteric BMD and T scores was 0.219+/-0.04 and 0.210+/-0.05 (Spearman's coefficient). Only one observer (senior radiologist) reached the significance level after grouping the patients' DXA results according to WHO criteria and correlating the results with SI gradings. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant influence of trochanteric T score in two observers while other variable parameters failed to reach the significance level. Even though we found reasonable intraobserver agreement assessment of SI is highly subjective and interobserver agreement is generally poor. Moreover, using digital radiography could not improve correlation with DXA measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18450400     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  7 in total

1.  Can bone quality be predicted accurately by Singh index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Cemal Bes; Melih Güven; Budak Akman; Evren Fehmi Atay; Emrah Ceviz; Mehmet Soy
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Deep Radiomics-based Approach to the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Using Hip Radiographs.

Authors:  Sangwook Kim; Bo Ram Kim; Hee-Dong Chae; Jimin Lee; Sung-Joon Ye; Dong Hyun Kim; Sung Hwan Hong; Ja-Young Choi; Hye Jin Yoo
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis?

Authors:  L Konstantinidis; C Papaioannou; P Blanke; A Hirschmüller; N P Südkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Evaluation of Singh Index and Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians as risk assessment tools of hip fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Zhenyu Liu; Hua Gao; Xiaodong Bai; Liang Zhao; Yadong Li; Baojun Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Epidemiological investigation of hospitalized patients with traumatic fractures: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zeyue Jin; Hongzhi Lv; Ming Li; Zhiyong Hou; Xiaodong Lian; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Predicting the Anatomical Location of Neck of Femur Fractures in Osteoporotic Geriatric Indian Population.

Authors:  M R Thirunthaiyan; K Mukherjee; Tkr Prashanth; D R Kumar
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2022-03

7.  The predictive value of the Singh index for the risk of InterTAN intramedullary fixation failure in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Guang Tian; Chen Liu; Yangjiang Xie; Ruguo Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.562

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.