Literature DB >> 23700251

Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty.

Michele Vasso1, Philippe Beaufils, Alfredo Schiavone Panni.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Along with the increase in primary total knee arthroplasty, there has been an increase in the number of revisions. The aim of this study was to propose a selection algorithm for the knee revision constraint according to the state of ligaments and to the bone defects Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Classification [AORI] classification. The hypothesis was that this algorithm would facilitate the appropriate choice of prosthesis constraint, thus providing stable components and a good long-term survivorship of the knee revisions.
METHODS: Sixty consecutive revision knee arthroplasties in 57 patients were prospectively evaluated. Prostheses implanted at revision included postero-stabilised, condylar constrained and rotating hinged, relative to the state of the ligaments and of the bone loss around the knee. The median follow-up was nine years (range, 4-12).
RESULTS: The median IKS knee and function scores and HSS score were 41 (15-62), 21.5 (12-43) and 34 (23-65) points, respectively, before the operation, and 81 (48-97), 79 (56-92) and 83.5 (62-98) points (p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up evaluation. The median ROM increased from 74° (29-110°) preoperatively to 121° (98-132°) (p < 0.01) at the final follow-up. Re-revision was necessary in five (8.3%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A selection algorithm for the revision implant constraint based on the state of ligaments and the bone loss AORI classification could provide stable knee reconstructions and long-term success of knee revisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23700251      PMCID: PMC3685670          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1929-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

Review 1.  Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems.

Authors:  Craig S Radnay; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Total knee arthroplasty with modular rotating-platform hinge.

Authors:  Richard E Jones
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Constrained condylar knee without stem extensions for difficult primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  John A Anderson; Andrea Baldini; James H MacDonald; Ivan Tomek; Paul M Pellicci; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  J P Whittaker; R Dharmarajan; A D Toms
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-08

5.  Functional advantage of articulating versus static spacers in 2-stage revision for total knee arthroplasty infection.

Authors:  Mark G Freeman; Thomas K Fehring; Susan M Odum; Keith Fehring; William L Griffin; J Bohannon Mason
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population.

Authors:  Nizar N Mahomed; Jane Barrett; Jeffrey N Katz; John A Baron; John Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction in TKA at a mean of 56 months.

Authors:  R S J Burnett; R A Butler; R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Customised hinged knee replacements as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M R Utting; J H Newman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Quality of life and clinical outcome in salvage revision total knee replacement: hinged vs total condylar design.

Authors:  Susanne Fuchs; Christian Sandmann; Georg Gerdemann; Adrian Skwara; Carsten O Tibesku; Friedrich Bottner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Modular augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michele Vasso; Simone Cerciello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  23 in total

1.  Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Does a non-stemmed constrained condylar prosthesis predispose to early failure of primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ajit J Deshmukh; Parthiv A Rathod; Michael J Moses; Nimrod Snir; Scott E Marwin; Alan J Dayan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Factors affecting the choice of constrained prostheses when performing revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cheol Hee Park; Jung Kwon Bae; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Articulated spacer provides long-term knee improvement after two-stage reimplantation.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Chiara Del Regno; Katia Corona; Rocco D'Apolito; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Increased constraint of rotating hinge knee prosthesis is associated with poorer clinical outcomes as compared to constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason Beng Teck Lim; Hee Nee Pang; Keng Jin Darren Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-16

6.  Are Serum Metal Ion Levels a Concern at Mid-term Followup of Revision Knee Arthroplasty With a Metal-on-metal Hinge Design?

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; Esko Meine; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Turgay Efe; Friedrich Boettner; Thomas Jan Heyse
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Primary modular total knee replacement in severe and unstable osteoarthritis. Predictive factors for failure.

Authors:  Rafael Luque; Belen Rizo; Antonio Urda; Rodrigo Garcia-Crespo; Enrique Moro; Luis López-Durán
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Walking after incomplete spinal cord injury with an implanted neuromuscular electrical stimulation system and a hinged knee replacement: a single-subject study.

Authors:  Nathaniel S Makowski; Lisa M Lombardo; Kevin M Foglyano; Rudi Kobetic; Gilles Pinault; Stephen M Selkirk; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-09-15

9.  Prosthetic knee infection by resistant bacteria: the worst-case scenario.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Ivan De Martino; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Mid-level constraint may correct coronal plane imbalance without compromising patient function in patients with severe osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J A Dubin; G H Westrich
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.