Literature DB >> 15581767

Customised hinged knee replacements as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty.

M R Utting1, J H Newman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure of knee arthroplasty can lead to significant pain and functional disability. In a small number of patients with fracture, sepsis or massive bone loss they are considered for arthrodesis or above knee amputation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the results and complications of using customised hinged knee replacements in their place.
METHODS: Since 1993, 30 of the 280 (10.7%) revision knee replacements in the Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Bristol have used Endo customised hinged knee prostheses (21 rotating, nine fixed) for salvage of limb threatening situations in elderly patients. Surgical indications were 22 low periprosthetic fractures (with or without aseptic loosening), five massive aseptic osteolyses, and three deep infections.
RESULTS: The mean length of post-operative hospital stay was just 14.6 days and all patients were discharged walking with aids. At follow up (mean 3.0 years, range 0.5-9.3 years) nine patients had died with their prostheses in situ and functioning. Six patients developed deep sepsis, two of which underwent above knee amputation, and two had received further surgery for septic problems. Two patients required further surgery for prosthetic disarticulation and one patient had successful on table vascular repair. Twenty-five patients had mid- or long- term follow up. Their mean American Knee scores (AKS) were 69.8 for knee and 35.6 for function (maximum 100), with mean total knee flexion 83 degrees. Mean Oxford knee scores (OKS) and WOMAC scores (both scored between 12 and 60 with low score indicating less difficulties) were 34.0 and 30.5, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Customised hinge revision knee replacements gave rapid rehabilitation and hospital discharge. Complications were high but at mid- and long-term review, no prostheses had failed from an aseptic cause and most of the knees of this challenging group were providing both stability and flexion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15581767     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2003.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

Review 1.  Megaprostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint: indication, technique, results and review of literature.

Authors:  Reinhard Windhager; Markus Schreiner; Kevin Staats; Sebastian Apprich
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Philippe Beaufils; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

Authors:  S A Hanna; W J S Aston; N J de Roeck; A Gough-Palmer; D P Powles
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees.

Authors:  Jae-Hyuk Yang; Jung-Ro Yoon; Chi-Hun Oh; Taik-Sun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Sun-Chul Hwang; Jae-Yeon Kong; Dae-Cheol Nam; Dong-Hee Kim; Hyung-Bin Park; Soon-Taek Jeong; Se-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04

6.  Arthrodesis After Infected Revision TKA: Retrospective Comparison of Intramedullary Nailing and External Fixation.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Iacono Francesco; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Raspugli Giovanni Francesco; Danilo Bruni; Bruni Danilo; Mirco Lo Presti; Lo Presti Mirco; Bharat Sharma; Sharma Bharat; Ibrahim Akkawi; Akkawi Ibrahim; Maurilio Marcacci; Marcacci Maurilio
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-14

7.  Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Knee arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jeroen De Vil; Karl Fredrik Almqvist; Philippe Vanheeren; Barbara Boone; René Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Results of a Second-generation Constrained Condylar Prosthesis in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Mean 5.5-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Chen-Yi Ye; De-Ting Xue; Shuai Jiang; Rong-Xin He
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Distal femoral replacement with the MML system: a single center experience with an average follow-up of 86 months.

Authors:  Andreas Toepfer; Norbert Harrasser; Paul-Ruben Schwarz; Florian Pohlig; Ulrich Lenze; Heinrich M L Mühlhofer; Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Christian Suren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.