Literature DB >> 26130276

Primary modular total knee replacement in severe and unstable osteoarthritis. Predictive factors for failure.

Rafael Luque1, Belen Rizo2, Antonio Urda2, Rodrigo Garcia-Crespo2, Enrique Moro2, Luis López-Durán2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Severe cases of osteoarthritis with ligamentous instability require the use of a modular knee arthoplasty. To assess the survival, the complications, the clinical, radiological and functional outcomes, and the quality of life of those patients in whom a Optetrak Condylar Constrained Knee (CCK) had been implanted as a primary implant. To study how the pre-operative conditions (deformity, age, sex …) and the characteristics of the arthroplasty (stems, supplements, constrained component …) could change the survival or the clinical outcomes of the implants.
METHODS: We performed an observational retrospective study of 105 CCKs implanted between 1999 and 2005. The mean follow-up was nine years (7, 13). Mean age was 70.5 years. The mortality was 6.9 %. There were 9.3 % of the patients lost during the follow-up. We studied all the medical files of the patients in order to assess the pre-operative, surgical and postoperative conditions. We used the Knee Society Score (KSS), both clinical and functional, to study the functional and clinical situation. We analysed the X-ray using the Knee Society roentgenographic evaluation. The quality of life was studied using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Then in order to find predictor conditions, we made statistical multivariable predictive studies attending to the preoperative factors and to the arthroplasty conditions to compare both outcomes and survival (Kaplan-Meier groups curves and Cox Multivariable Models [hazard ratio]). Processing and data analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0.
RESULTS: The outcomes did not show differences between all the groups. While the mean result of the clinical KSS was 75.8, the mean functional KSS was 73.1. We did not find a condition associated with worst results of the knees (p > 0.05). The KSS obtained was excellent or good in 74.9 %. The global survival at 24 months was 93.8 % and at 96 months was 90.1 %. There were some conditions associated with poorest survival of the arthroplasties: patients younger than 70 years old, tibial tuberosity osteotomy, use of long stems and new surgery two months after arthoplasty (p < 0.05). The 11.1 % of the arthroplasties required more surgeries (3.3 % were soft tissue surgeries and 7.8 % were revisions). The mean OKS obtained was 34.78. Satisfaction was obtained by 86.2 % of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: All severe and unstable knees obtained similar and overall excellent-good outcomes and survival using the Optetrak CCK. Although we found that there are some factors that could change the survival of the total knee replacement, these did not change the outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Constrained implant; Deformity; Ligamentous instability; Outcomes; Preoperative condition; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26130276     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2807-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  48 in total

1.  The press-fit condylar total knee system: 8- to 10-year results with a posterior cruciate-retaining design.

Authors:  K O Buehler; E Venn-Watson; D D D'Lima; C W Colwell
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Does a non-stemmed constrained condylar prosthesis predispose to early failure of primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ajit J Deshmukh; Parthiv A Rathod; Michael J Moses; Nimrod Snir; Scott E Marwin; Alan J Dayan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Trends in total knee arthroplasty implant utilization.

Authors:  Long-Co L Nguyen; Mandeep S Lehil; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  S D Martin; J L McManus; R D Scott; T S Thornhill
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Survival of primary condylar-constrained total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 7 years.

Authors:  Lance M Maynard; Timothy J Sauber; Vasileios K Kostopoulos; Gregory S Lavigne; Jeffrey J Sewecke; Nicholas G Sotereanos
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Body mass index as a predictor of outcome in total knee replacement.

Authors:  D D Spicer; D L Pomeroy; W E Badenhausen; L A Schaper; J I Curry; K E Suthers; M W Smith
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Knee arthroplasties have similar results in high- and low-activity patients.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; David R Marker; Thorsten M Seyler; Noah Gordon; David S Hungerford; Lynne C Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Total knee arthroplasty in the valgus knee.

Authors:  Roberto Rossi; Federica Rosso; Umberto Cottino; Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Long-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Cholewinski; S Putman; L Vasseur; H Migaud; A Duhamel; H Behal; G Pasquier
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.256

View more
  7 in total

1.  Outcomes after knee arthroplasty in extra-articular deformity.

Authors:  Fabricio Bolpato Loures; Wesley Correia; João Henrique Reis; Rodrigo Sattamini Pires E Albuquerque; Alan de Paula Mozela; Eduardo Branco de Souza; Phelippe Valente Maia; João Maurício Barretto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Patient reported outcomes in three hundred and twenty eight bilateral total knee replacement cases (simultaneous versus staged arthroplasty) using the Oxford Knee Score.

Authors:  Simon G F Abram; Fiona Nicol; Simon J Spencer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Is varus-valgus constraint a reliable option in complex primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Francesco Falez; Fabrizio Mocini; Peter K Sculco; Giulio Maccauro; Ivan De Martino
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-06

4.  Abnormally high dislocation rate following constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for valgus knee: a case-control study.

Authors:  Feng Li; Ning Liu; Zijian Li; Kirkham B Wood; Hua Tian
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Satisfactory mid-term outcomes of condylar-constrained knee implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological follow-up.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Ivan De Martino; Aaron Burrofato; Carmine De Ieso; Maristella F Saccomanno; Giulio Maccauro; Vincenzo De Santis
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2020-12-02

6.  When to Use a Condylar Constrained Insert in Non-Stemmed Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Satit Thiengwittayaporn; Natthapong Hongku; Umaporn Uawisetwathana; Pichai Sansawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-07-03

7.  A Comparison Between Unstemmed and Stemmed Constrained Condylar Knee Prostheses in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  En-Ze Zhao; Wei-Nan Zeng; Zi-Chuan Ding; Zun-Han Liu; Zhen-Yu Luo; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.