Literature DB >> 26362647

Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Danielle Y Ponzio1, Matthew S Austin2.   

Abstract

The etiology of bone loss encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often multifactorial and can include stress shielding, osteolysis, osteonecrosis, infection, mechanical loss due to a grossly loose implant, and iatrogenic loss at the time of implant resection. Selection of the reconstructive technique(s) to manage bone deficiency is determined by the location and magnitude of bone loss, ligament integrity, surgeon experience, and patient factors including the potential for additional revision, functional demand, and comorbidities. Smaller, contained defects are reliably managed with bone graft, cement augmented with screw fixation, or modular augments. Large metaphyseal defects require more extensive reconstruction such as impaction bone grafting with or without mesh augmentation, prosthetic augmentation, use of bulk structural allografts, or use of metaphyseal cones or sleeves. While each technique has advantages and disadvantages, the most optimal method for reconstruction of large metaphyseal bone defects during revision TKA is not clearly established.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augments; Bone loss; Bulk structural allograft; Metaphyseal cone; Metaphyseal sleeve; Revision total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2015        PMID: 26362647      PMCID: PMC4630235          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-015-9291-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  34 in total

Review 1.  Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas W Huff; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Daniel J Berry; Gerard Engh; Thomas Fehring; Steven J MacDonald; Aaron Glen Rosenberg; Giles Scuderi
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Revision knee arthroplasty for bone loss: choosing the right degree of constraint.

Authors:  Chao Shen; Paul M Lichstein; Matthew S Austin; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised?

Authors:  David F Dalury; Donald L Pomeroy; Robert S Gorab; Mary Jo Adams
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results.

Authors:  Steven L Barnett; Ryan R Mayer; Joseph S Gondusky; Leera Choi; Jay J Patel; Robert S Gorab
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Bone loss following knee arthroplasty: potential treatment options.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Philippe Beaufils; Simone Cerciello; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James L Howard; Jeremy Kudera; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Basilio De la Torre-Escudero; José M Rojo-Manaute; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Francisco Chana-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and techniques.

Authors:  George J Haidukewych; Arlen Hanssen; Richard Dickey Jones
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Michael P Bolognesi; Robert A Henderson; Elizabeth S Soileau; Thomas Parker Vail
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  13 in total

1.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

2.  Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; Christian Oakley; Jore H Willems; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Petra Heesterbeek; Joshua Rozell; Scott Marwin; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  The impact of posterior-stabilized vs. constrained polyethylene liners in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; Christian T Oakley; Geidily Beaton; Utkarsh Anil; Nimrod Snir; Joshua Rozell; Morteza Meftah; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 4.  Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Bieganowski; Daniel B Buchalter; Vivek Singh; John J Mercuri; Vinay K Aggarwal; Joshua C Rozell; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-20

5.  Management of Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Use of a Stepped, Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeve.

Authors:  Marc R Angerame; Jason M Jennings; David C Holst; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-04-24

6.  Revision total knee arthroplasty using a custom tantalum implant in a patient following multiple failed revisions.

Authors:  Colin A McNamara; Raúl G Gösthe; Preetesh D Patel; Kristopher C Sanders; Gustavo Huaman; Juan C Suarez
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-11-03

Review 7.  Are Metaphyseal Sleeves a Viable Option to Treat Bone Defect during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tommaso Bonanzinga; Ibrahim Akkawi; Akos Zahar; Thorsten Gehrke; Carl Haasper; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2019-10-11

8.  Early Survivorship of Newly Designed Highly Porous Metaphyseal Tibial Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian P Chalmers; Christina M Malfer; David J Mayman; Geoffrey H Westrich; Peter K Sculco; Mathias P Bostrom; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-02-23

9.  Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves used in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ron Gurel; Samuel Morgan; Etay Elbaz; Itay Ashlenazi; Nimrod Snir; Assaf Kadar; Aviram Gold; Yaniv Warschawski
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-04

10.  Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications.

Authors:  Brianna Fram; Eric B Smith; Gregory K Deirmengian; John A Abraham; John Strony; Michael B Cross; Danielle Y Ponzio
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.