PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of transcytolemmal water exchange on the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T(1)-weighted MRI of human squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients with HNSCC nodal metastasis underwent pretreatment DCE-MRI with a temporal resolution of 2.5 seconds and a spatial resolution of 1 mm x 1 mm x 5 mm at 1.5T. We used two pharmacokinetic models for data analysis: generalized kinetic model (GKM) without considering transcytolemmal water exchange and the shutter-speed model (SSM), based on a two-site exchange model for transcytolemmal water exchange. The results were compared in three subgroups of voxels in the tumor depending on the level of contrast enhancement. RESULTS: SSM was found to be a better fit for more than 75% of pixels of all subjects (P < 0.01) in terms of residual size and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). For all three subgroups based on the contrast enhancement, the median K trans values of SSM were 42% to 55% higher than those of GKM and the median upsilon e values of SSM were 116% to 176% larger than those of GKM. The median K trans and upsilon e of two models were found significantly different (P < 0.01). The median tau i measured by SSM were from 211 to 364 msec. CONCLUSION: The effect of transcytolemmal water exchange is an important factor that needs to be incorporated for adequate modeling of contrast enhancement dynamics measured by MRI of HNSCC. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of transcytolemmal water exchange on the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T(1)-weighted MRI of humansquamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients with HNSCC nodal metastasis underwent pretreatment DCE-MRI with a temporal resolution of 2.5 seconds and a spatial resolution of 1 mm x 1 mm x 5 mm at 1.5T. We used two pharmacokinetic models for data analysis: generalized kinetic model (GKM) without considering transcytolemmal water exchange and the shutter-speed model (SSM), based on a two-site exchange model for transcytolemmal water exchange. The results were compared in three subgroups of voxels in the tumor depending on the level of contrast enhancement. RESULTS: SSM was found to be a better fit for more than 75% of pixels of all subjects (P < 0.01) in terms of residual size and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). For all three subgroups based on the contrast enhancement, the median K trans values of SSM were 42% to 55% higher than those of GKM and the median upsilon e values of SSM were 116% to 176% larger than those of GKM. The median K trans and upsilon e of two models were found significantly different (P < 0.01). The median tau i measured by SSM were from 211 to 364 msec. CONCLUSION: The effect of transcytolemmal water exchange is an important factor that needs to be incorporated for adequate modeling of contrast enhancement dynamics measured by MRI of HNSCC. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: S Kim; L A Loevner; H Quon; A Kilger; E Sherman; G Weinstein; A Chalian; H Poptani Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alana R Amarosa; Jason McKellop; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Melanie Moccaldi; Tess V Clendenen; James S Babb; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Linda Moy; Sungheon Kim Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jacobus F A Jansen; Heiko Schöder; Nancy Y Lee; Ya Wang; David G Pfister; Matthew G Fury; Hilda E Stambuk; John L Humm; Jason A Koutcher; Amita Shukla-Dave Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Mia Levy; David Smith; E Brian Welch; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: J Oncol Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.375