Literature DB >> 26412889

Prediction of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI using mammography, ultrasonography, and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Akiko Kawamura1, Hiroko Satake1, Satoko Ishigaki1, Mitsuru Ikeda2, Reiko Kimura1, Kazuhiro Shimamoto1, Shinji Naganawa1.   

Abstract

This retrospective study assessed the effects of menopausal status and menstrual cycle on background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and investigated whether the degree of BPE can be predicted by findings of mammography, ultrasonography (US), and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI). There were 160 study patients (80 premenopausal, 80 postmenopausal). Degree of BPE was classified into minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. Mammographic density was classified into fatty, scattered, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense. BP echotexture on US and BP intensity on DWI were visually classified as homogeneous or heterogeneous. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of normal breast tissue were measured. Associations of the degree of BPE with menopausal status, menstrual cycle, or imaging features were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. No significant correlation was found between mammographic density and BPE (p=0.085), whereas menopausal status (p=0.000), BP echotexture (p=0.000), and BP intensity on DWI (p= 0.000), and ADC values (p=0.000) showed significant correlations with BPE. Multivariate analysis showed that postmenopausal status was an independent predictor of minimal BPE (p=0.002, OR=3.743). In premenopausal women, there was no significant correlation between menstrual cycle and BPE, whereas BP echotexture was an independent predictor of whether BPE was less than mild or greater than moderate (p=0.001, OR=26.575). BPE on breast MRI is associated with menopausal status and the findings of US and DWI. Because premenopausal women with heterogeneous BP echotexture may be predicted to show moderate or marked BPE, scheduling of breast MRI should preferentially be adjusted to the menstrual cycle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  background parenchymal enhancement; diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); menopausal status, mammography; ultrasonography (US)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26412889      PMCID: PMC4574330     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  22 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters.

Authors:  Maki Hirano; Hiroko Satake; Satoko Ishigaki; Mitsuru Ikeda; Hisashi Kawai; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.

Authors:  Christiane Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami; Junichiro Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: influence of menstrual cycle and breast composition.

Authors:  Seok Seon Kang; Eun Young Ko; Boo-Kyung Han; Jung Hee Shin; Soo Yeon Hahn; Eun Sook Ko
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up.

Authors:  Niamh M Hambly; Laura Liberman; D David Dershaw; Sandra Brennan; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  P A Baltzer; M Dietzel; T Vag; H Burmeister; M Gajda; O Camara; S O Pfleiderer; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2011-02-11

8.  Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound.

Authors:  Eun Sook Ko; Byung Hee Lee; Hye Young Choi; Rock Bum Kim; Woo-Chul Noh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  M Müller-Schimpfle; K Ohmenhaüser; P Stoll; K Dietz; C D Claussen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The effect of age and menstrual cycle upon proliferative activity of the normal human breast.

Authors:  C S Potten; R J Watson; G T Williams; S Tickle; S A Roberts; M Harris; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bianca Bignotti; Alessio Signori; Francesca Valdora; Federica Rossi; Massimo Calabrese; Manuela Durando; Giovanna Mariscotto; Alberto Tagliafico
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping using diffusion-weighted MRI: impact of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue and menopausal status on breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Joao V Horvat; Manuela Durando; Soledad Milans; Sujata Patil; Jessica Massler; Girard Gibbons; Dilip Giri; Katja Pinker; Elizabeth A Morris; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Analysis of background parenchymal echogenicity on breast ultrasound: Correlation with mammographic breast density and background parenchymal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung; Inwha Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Correlation Between Mammographic Breast Density, Breast Tissue Type in Ultrasonography, Fibroglandular Tissue, and Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Afsaneh Alikhassi; Seyedeh Nooshin Miratashi Yazdi; Hedieh Akbari; Sona Akbari Kia; Masoud Baikpour
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2018-04-18

5.  Comparison of the background echotexture between automated breast ultrasound and handheld breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Jieun Kim; Eun Young Ko; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Sook Ko; Ji Soo Choi; Ko Woon Park; Haejung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  The association between breast cancer risk factors and background parenchymal enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.

Authors:  Roxanna Hellgren; Ariel Saracco; Fredrik Strand; Mikael Eriksson; Ann Sundbom; Per Hall; Paul W Dickman
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 1.990

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.