Literature DB >> 26351036

The relationship of breast density in mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk women and women with breast cancer.

Marissa Albert1, Freya Schnabel2, Jennifer Chun2, Shira Schwartz2, Jiyon Lee1, Ana Paula Klautau Leite3, Linda Moy4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between mammographic breast density (MBD), background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in women with breast cancer (BC) and at high risk for developing BC.
METHODS: Our institutional database was queried for patients who underwent mammography and MRI.
RESULTS: Four hundred three (85%) had BC and 72 (15%) were at high risk. MBD (P=.0005), BPE (P<.0001), and FGT (P=.02) were all higher in high-risk women compared to the BC group.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of MBD, BPE and FGT are seen in women at higher risk for developing BC when compared to women with BC.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPE; Breast cancer; Density; MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26351036      PMCID: PMC4686383          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  57 in total

1.  Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories.

Authors:  S Ciatto; N Houssami; A Apruzzese; E Bassetti; B Brancato; F Carozzi; S Catarzi; M P Lamberini; G Marcelli; R Pellizzoni; B Pesce; G Risso; F Russo; A Scorsolini
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography.

Authors:  William E Barlow; Emily White; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Pamela M Vacek; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Patricia A Carney; Jeffrey A Tice; Diana S M Buist; Berta M Geller; Robert Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Obesity as a risk factor for development and poor prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  A R Carmichael
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment.

Authors:  E A Ooms; H M Zonderland; M J C Eijkemans; M Kriege; B Mahdavian Delavary; C W Burger; A C Ansink
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training.

Authors:  Amy Melsaether; Meredith McDermott; Dipti Gupta; Kristine Pysarenko; Sara D Shaylor; Linda Moy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Authors:  M O Leach; C R M Boggis; A K Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G R Evans; F J Gilbert; I Griebsch; R J C Hoff; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; D Thompson; R M L Warren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Laura Ichikawa; William E Barlow; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  Factors associated with MRI detection of occult lesions in newly diagnosed breast cancers.

Authors:  Julie Wecsler; Young Ju Jeong; Akshara S Raghavendra; Wendy J Mack; Debasish Tripathy; Mary W Yamashita; Pulin A Sheth; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Christy A Russell; Heather MacDonald; Stephen F Sener; Julie E Lang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bianca Bignotti; Alessio Signori; Francesca Valdora; Federica Rossi; Massimo Calabrese; Manuela Durando; Giovanna Mariscotto; Alberto Tagliafico
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Intake of dietary carbohydrates in early adulthood and adolescence and breast density among young women.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Olga Goloubeva; Nola Hylton; Catherine Klifa; Erin LeBlanc; John Shepherd; Linda Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Breast cancer and background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Na Hu; Jinghao Zhao; Yong Li; Quanshui Fu; Linwei Zhao; Hong Chen; Wei Qin; Guoqing Yang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Fibroglandular Tissue and Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MR Imaging Correlates With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoxin Hu; Luan Jiang; Chao You; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  A pilot study: Quantify lung volume and emphysema extent directly from two-dimensional scout images.

Authors:  Jiantao Pu; Jacob Sechrist; Xin Meng; Joseph K Leader; Frank C Sciurba
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.506

7.  The Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) in a High-Risk Population: What Causes BPE?

Authors:  Chao You; Anna K Kaiser; Pascal Baltzer; Julia Krammer; Yajia Gu; Weijun Peng; Stefan O Schönberg; Clemens G Kaiser
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 4.243

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.