Literature DB >> 23653133

Effect of pilot hole on biomechanical and in vivo pedicle screw-bone interface.

Patrícia Silva1, Rodrigo César Rosa, Antonio Carlos Shimano, Helton L A Defino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To experimentally study the influence of pilot hole diameter (smaller than or equal to the internal (core) diameter of the screw) on biomechanical (insertion torque and pullout strength) and histomorphometric parameters of screw-bone interface in the acute phase and 8 weeks after pedicle screw insertion.
METHODS: Fifteen sheep were operated upon and pedicle screws inserted in the L1-L3 pedicles bilaterally. The pilot hole was smaller (2.0 mm) than the internal diameter (core) of the screw on the left side pedicle and equal (2.8 mm) to the internal diameter (core) of the screw on the right side pedicle. Ten animals were sacrificed immediately (five animals were assigned to pullout strength tests and five animals were used for histomorphometric bone-screw interface evaluation). Five animals were sacrificed 8 weeks after pedicle screw insertion for histomorphometric bone-screw interface evaluation.
RESULTS: The insertion torque and pullout strength were significantly greater in pedicle screws inserted into pilot holes smaller than internal (core) diameter of the screw. Histomorphometric evaluation of bone-screw interface showed that the percentage of bone-implant contact, the area of bone inside the screw thread and the area of bone outside the screw thread were significantly higher for pilot holes smaller than the internal (core) diameter of the screw immediately after insertion and after 8 weeks.
CONCLUSION: A pilot diameter smaller than the internal (core) diameter of the screw improved the insertion torque and pullout strength immediately after screw insertion as well the pedicle screw-bone interface contact immediately and 8 weeks after screw placement in sheep with good bone mineral density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23653133      PMCID: PMC3731481          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2810-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  40 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design.

Authors:  S D Cook; S L Salkeld; T S Whitecloud; J Barbera
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-06

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  T H Lim; J G Kim; A Fujiwara; T T Yoon; S C Lee; J W Ha; H S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Role of cortical and cancellous bone of the vertebral pedicle in implant fixation.

Authors:  H L Defino; J R Vendrame
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out.

Authors:  B B Abshire; R F McLain; A Valdevit; H E Kambic
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Maximiliano Aguiar Porto; Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo Rosa; José Batista Volpon; Antônio Carlos Shimano; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Biomechanical investigation of pedicle screw-vertebrae complex: a finite element approach using bonded and contact interface conditions.

Authors:  S-I Chen; R-M Lin; C-H Chang
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Improved bone-screw interface with hydroxyapatite coating: an in vivo study of loaded pedicle screws in sheep.

Authors:  B Sandén; C Olerud; C Johansson; S Larsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  New segmental long bone defect model in sheep: quantitative analysis of healing with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  F C den Boer; P Patka; F C Bakker; B W Wippermann; A van Lingen; G Q Vink; K Boshuizen; H J Haarman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  The early tissue response to titanium and LactoSorb screws.

Authors:  Nur Mollaoglu; Sedat Cetiner; Cansu Alpaslan; Sibel Elif Gültekin; Reha Alpar
Journal:  Dent Traumatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  4 in total

1.  In vitro biomechanical study of pedicle screw pull-out strength based on different screw path preparation techniques.

Authors:  Mark Moldavsky; Kanaan Salloum; Brandon Bucklen; Saif Khalil; Jwalant S Mehta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 2.  Lumbar pedicle screw fixation with cortical bone trajectory: A review from anatomical and biomechanical standpoints.

Authors:  Keitaro Matsukawa; Yoshiyuki Yato
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-11-27

3.  DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH.

Authors:  Rômulo Pedroza Pinheiro; Ariane Zamarioli; Thibault Chandanson; Keri George; Antonio Carlos Shimano; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

4.  A Hybrid 3D-2D Image Registration Framework for Pedicle Screw Trajectory Registration between Intraoperative X-ray Image and Preoperative CT Image.

Authors:  Roshan Ramakrishna Naik; Anitha Hoblidar; Shyamasunder N Bhat; Nishanth Ampar; Raghuraj Kundangar
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-07-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.