Literature DB >> 14697871

Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone.

Michael A K Liebschner1.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering combines the aspects of cell biology, engineering, material science, and surgery to generate new functional tissue, and provides an important approach to the repair of segmental defects and in restoring biomechanical function. The development of tissue-engineering strategies into clinical therapeutic protocols requires extensive, preclinical experimentation in appropriate animal models. The ultimate success of any treatment strategy must be established in these animal models before clinical application. It is clear that the demands of the biological and mechanical environment in the clinical repair of critical size defects with tissue-engineered materials is significantly different from those existing in experimental animals. The major considerations facing any tissue-engineering testing logic include the choice of the defect, the animal, the age of the animal, the anatomic site, the size of the lesion, and most importantly, the micro-mechanical environment. With respect to biomechanical considerations when selecting animals for tissue- engineering of bone, it is evident that no common criteria have been reported. While in smaller animals due to size constraint only structural properties of whole bones can be measured, in larger animals and humans both material properties and structural properties are of interest. Based on reported results, comparison between the tissue-engineered bone across species may be of importance in establishing better model selection criteria. It has already been found that the deformation of long bones is fairly constant across species, and that stress levels during gait are dependent on the weight of the animal and the material properties of the bone tissue. Future research should therefore be geared towards developing better biomechanical testing systems and then finding the right animal model for the existing equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14697871     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00515-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  53 in total

1.  Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Maximiliano Aguiar Porto; Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo Rosa; José Batista Volpon; Antônio Carlos Shimano; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Runx2 overexpression in bone marrow stromal cells accelerates bone formation in critical-sized femoral defects.

Authors:  Abigail M Wojtowicz; Kellie L Templeman; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg; Andrés J García
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Michael A K Liebschner; Joshua W Little; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  [Conductive bone substitute material with variable antibiotic delivery].

Authors:  C Englert; P Angele; J Fierlbeck; S Dendorfer; T Schubert; R Müller; S Lienhard; J Zellner; M Nerlich; C Neumann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Application of selected scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sepanta Hosseinpour; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie; Maryam Rezai Rad; Mohammad Taghi Baghani; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Arash Khojasteh
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

Review 6.  Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-21

7.  Ovine model for critical-size tibial segmental defects.

Authors:  Chris Christou; Rema A Oliver; Matthew H Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.982

8.  Rise of the Pigs: Utilization of the Porcine Model to Study Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering During Skeletal Growth.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Paul B Warren; Matthew B Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.056

9.  Coating of biomaterial scaffolds with the collagen-mimetic peptide GFOGER for bone defect repair.

Authors:  Abigail M Wojtowicz; Asha Shekaran; Megan E Oest; Kenneth M Dupont; Kellie L Templeman; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg; Andrés J García
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  External fixation compared to intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures in the rat.

Authors:  Ulf E W Sigurdsen; Olav Reikeras; Stein Erik Utvag
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.