Literature DB >> 22173611

Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Maximiliano Aguiar Porto1, Patrícia Silva, Rodrigo Rosa, José Batista Volpon, Antônio Carlos Shimano, Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula, Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Self-drilling screws (SDS) and self-tapping screws (STS) allow for quicker bone insertion and are associated with increased anchorage. This is an experimental in vivo comparison of anterior cervical SDS and STS in the post-insertion acute and chronic phases.
METHODS: Thirty C2-C6 vertebrae from six Santa Inês hair sheep were used. Each screw design was randomly assigned to five of each spinal level. Insertion torque was measured using a torque device. Three animals were killed in each phase. Vertebrae were randomly assigned to pullout tests and histomorphometrical bone-screw interface evaluation (percent screw-bone contact and bone density inside and outside the threaded area). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
RESULTS: SDS insertion torque was greater than STS (P = 0.0001). SDS pullout strength was significantly greater than STS in the acute and chronic phases (P = 0.0001, 0.0003, respectively). SDS percent screw-bone contact and inside area bone density were significantly greater in both phases. No outside area bone density differences were observed in either phase.
CONCLUSIONS: SDS had higher insertion torque and better anchorage than STS in both phases. SDS percent bone-screw contact and inside area bone density were higher in both phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173611      PMCID: PMC3337909          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2120-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  35 in total

1.  [In vivo studies of screw-bone contact of drill-free screws and conventional self-tapping screws].

Authors:  W Heidemann; H Terheyden; K L Gerlach
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2001-01

2.  Effects of hole preparation on screw pullout resistance and insertional torque: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  B T Oktenoğlu; L A Ferrara; N Andalkar; A F Ozer; A C Sarioğlu; E C Benzel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  [Comparative in vitro studies of self-boring and self-tapping screws. Histomorphological and physical-technical studies of bone layers].

Authors:  J Löhr; N C Gellrich; P Büscher; D Wahl; B A Rahn
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2000-05

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of the pullout strength of cervical screws.

Authors:  Bryan P Conrad; Andrew G Cordista; MaryBeth Horodyski; Glenn R Rechtine
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-12

5.  The effect of end screw orientation on the stability of anterior instrumentation in cyclic lateral bending.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Olaverri; Amir Hasharoni; Hargovind DeWal; Roy M Nuzzo; Frederick J Kummer; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Eldin E Karaikovic; Eugene P Lautenschlager; David Marcu
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cervical spine stabilization.

Authors:  M R Grubb; B L Currier; J S Shih; V Bonin; J J Grabowski; E Y Chao
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Correlation of bone equivalent mineral density to pull-out resistance of triangulated pedicle screw construct.

Authors:  A G Hadjipavlou; C L Nicodemus; F A al-Hamdan; J W Simmons; M H Pope
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-02

9.  Clinical applications of drill free screws in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  W Heidemann; K L Gerlach
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  New segmental long bone defect model in sheep: quantitative analysis of healing with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  F C den Boer; P Patka; F C Bakker; B W Wippermann; A van Lingen; G Q Vink; K Boshuizen; H J Haarman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Biomechanical changes of sheep cervical spine after unilateral hemilaminectomy and different degrees of facetectomy].

Authors:  C Wu; Z Y Wang; G Z Lin; T Yu; B Liu; Y Si; Y B Zhang; Y C Li
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

2.  Effect of pilot hole on biomechanical and in vivo pedicle screw-bone interface.

Authors:  Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo César Rosa; Antonio Carlos Shimano; Helton L A Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Using self-drilling screws in volar plate osteosynthesis for distal radius fractures: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Alexaner Synek; Lars Borgmann; Hannes Traxler; Wolfgang Huf; Ekkehard Euler; Yan Chevalier; Sebastian F Baumbach
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.