PURPOSE:Self-drilling screws (SDS) and self-tapping screws (STS) allow for quicker bone insertion and are associated with increased anchorage. This is an experimental in vivo comparison of anterior cervical SDS and STS in the post-insertion acute and chronic phases. METHODS:Thirty C2-C6 vertebrae from six Santa Inês hair sheep were used. Each screw design was randomly assigned to five of each spinal level. Insertion torque was measured using a torque device. Three animals were killed in each phase. Vertebrae were randomly assigned to pullout tests and histomorphometrical bone-screw interface evaluation (percent screw-bone contact and bone density inside and outside the threaded area). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS:SDS insertion torque was greater than STS (P = 0.0001). SDS pullout strength was significantly greater than STS in the acute and chronic phases (P = 0.0001, 0.0003, respectively). SDS percent screw-bone contact and inside area bone density were significantly greater in both phases. No outside area bone density differences were observed in either phase. CONCLUSIONS: SDS had higher insertion torque and better anchorage than STS in both phases. SDS percent bone-screw contact and inside area bone density were higher in both phases.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Self-drilling screws (SDS) and self-tapping screws (STS) allow for quicker bone insertion and are associated with increased anchorage. This is an experimental in vivo comparison of anterior cervical SDS and STS in the post-insertion acute and chronic phases. METHODS: Thirty C2-C6 vertebrae from six Santa Inês hair sheep were used. Each screw design was randomly assigned to five of each spinal level. Insertion torque was measured using a torque device. Three animals were killed in each phase. Vertebrae were randomly assigned to pullout tests and histomorphometrical bone-screw interface evaluation (percent screw-bone contact and bone density inside and outside the threaded area). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS:SDS insertion torque was greater than STS (P = 0.0001). SDS pullout strength was significantly greater than STS in the acute and chronic phases (P = 0.0001, 0.0003, respectively). SDS percent screw-bone contact and inside area bone density were significantly greater in both phases. No outside area bone density differences were observed in either phase. CONCLUSIONS:SDS had higher insertion torque and better anchorage than STS in both phases. SDS percent bone-screw contact and inside area bone density were higher in both phases.
Authors: Juan C Rodríguez-Olaverri; Amir Hasharoni; Hargovind DeWal; Roy M Nuzzo; Frederick J Kummer; Thomas J Errico Journal: Spine J Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: F C den Boer; P Patka; F C Bakker; B W Wippermann; A van Lingen; G Q Vink; K Boshuizen; H J Haarman Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Alexaner Synek; Lars Borgmann; Hannes Traxler; Wolfgang Huf; Ekkehard Euler; Yan Chevalier; Sebastian F Baumbach Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 2.362