Literature DB >> 23651462

A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12.

William Noble1, Niels Søgaard Jensen, Graham Naylor, Navjot Bhullar, Michael A Akeroyd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a 12-item version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale for use in clinical research and rehabilitation settings, and provide a formula for converting scores between the full (SSQ49) and abbreviated (SSQ12) versions.
DESIGN: Items were selected independently at the three centres (Eriksholm Research Centre, MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University of New England) to be representative of the complete scale. A consensus was achieved after discussion. STUDY SAMPLE: The data set (n = 1220) used for a factor analysis (Akeroyd et al, submitted) was re-analysed to compare original SSQ scores (SSQ49) with scores on the short version (SSQ12).
RESULTS: A scatter-plot of SSQ12 scores against SSQ49 scores showed that SSQ12 score was about 0.6 of a scale point lower than the SSQ49 (0-10 scale) in the re-analysis of the Akeroyd et al data. SSQ12 scores lay on a slightly steeper slope than scores on the SSQ49.
CONCLUSIONS: The SSQ12 provides similar results to SSQ49 in a large clinical research sample. The slightly lower average SSQ12 score and the slightly steeper slope reflect the composition of this short form relative to the SSQ49.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23651462      PMCID: PMC3864780          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.781278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  11 in total

1.  Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods.

Authors:  Gurjit Singh; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  William Noble; Stuart Gatehouse
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Christina Fuller; Rolien Free; Bert Maat; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jan-Willem Beijen; Ad F M Snik; Emmanuel A M Mylanus
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid.

Authors:  Håkan Hua; Björn Johansson; Radi Jönsson; Lennart Magnusson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.

Authors:  Roman D Laske; Dorothe Veraguth; Norbert Dillier; Andrea Binkert; David Holzmann; Alexander M Huber
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale in clinically normal-hearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5).

Authors:  Kelly Demeester; Vedat Topsakal; Jan-Jaap Hendrickx; Erik Fransen; Lut van Laer; Guy Van Camp; Paul Van de Heyning; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale).

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Fiona H Guy; Dawn L Harrison; Sharon L Suller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Two-eared listening in dynamic situations.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Michael Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  40 in total

1.  Use of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life Instrument.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Craig A Velozo; Meredith A Holcomb; Elizabeth L Camposeo; Jonathan L Hatch; Ted A Meyer; Paul R Lambert; Cathy L Melvin; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 2.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

3.  Benefits of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral Naída CI cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Ghizlene Lahlou; Jonathan Flament; Nathalie Mathias; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers; Daniele Bernardeschi; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Towards a Unified Testing Framework for Single-Sided Deafness Studies: A Consensus Paper.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Dayse Távora-Vieira; Griet Mertens; Vincent Van Rompaey; Gunesh P Rajan; Joachim Müller; John Martin Hempel; Daniel Leander; Daniel Polterauer; Mathieu Marx; Shin-Ichi Usami; Ryosuke Kitoh; Maiko Miyagawa; Hideaki Moteki; Kari Smilsky; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Thomas Georg Keintzel; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Astrid Wolf-Magele; Susan Arndt; Thomas Wesarg; Stefan Zirn; Uwe Baumann; Tobias Weissgerber; Tobias Rader; Rudolf Hagen; Anja Kurz; Kristen Rak; Robert Stokroos; Erwin George; Ruben Polo; María Del Mar Medina; Yael Henkin; Ohad Hilly; David Ulanovski; Ranjith Rajeswaran; Mohan Kameswaran; Maria Fernanda Di Gregorio; Mario E Zernotti
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results.

Authors:  Dan Dupont Hougaard; Soren Kjaergaard Boldsen; Anne Marie Jensen; Soren Hansen; Per Cayé Thomassen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Sensory coding and cognitive processing of sound in Veterans with blast exposure.

Authors:  Scott Bressler; Hannah Goldberg; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech-in-Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Pamela E Souza; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Participant-generated Cochlear Implant Programs: Speech Recognition, Sound Quality, and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Robert T Dwyer; Tony Spahr; Smita Agrawal; Chris Hetlinger; Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Proposed norms for the Glasgow hearing-aid benefit profile (Ghabp) questionnaire.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Patrick Howell; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  The impact of cochlear implantation on health-related quality of life in older adults, measured with the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3.

Authors:  Ellen Andries; Annick Gilles; Vedat Topsakal; Olivier Vanderveken; Paul Van de Heyning; Vincent Van Rompaey; Griet Mertens
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.