Literature DB >> 16579492

Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

William Noble1, Stuart Gatehouse.   

Abstract

The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (Gatehouse & Noble, 2004) was applied to three independent clinical groups: 144 people prior to being fitted with amplification; 118 people with six months experience with unilateral amplification; and 42 people with six months experience with bilateral amplification. For traditional speech hearing contexts (one-on-one, in groups, in quiet, in noise) there was benefit with one aid, and no further benefit with two. By contrast, hearing speech in demanding contexts (divided or rapidly switching attention) showed benefit with one aid and further benefit with two. In the spatial domain, directional hearing showed some benefit with one hearing aid, and particular further benefit in distance and movement discrimination from fitting with two. There was some benefit from unilateral fitting for elements of the qualities domains (clarity, naturalness, recognisability, segregation of sounds), with no consistent sign of further benefit from two. Bilateral fitting added benefit with respect to listening effort. Two hearing aids offer advantage in demanding and dynamic contexts; these contexts are argued as significant in the maintenance of social competence and emotional wellbeing. The present results go toward establishing the real-world advantages of bilateral hearing aid fitting and suggest that previous, inconclusive clinical findings reflect inquiry limited to more traditional areas of hearing function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16579492     DOI: 10.1080/14992020500376933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  61 in total

1.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Level discrimination of speech sounds by hearing-impaired individuals with and without hearing amplification.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

4.  Patient-Related Benefits for Adults with Cochlear Implantation: A Multicultural Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Lida Muller; Hanna Czerniejewska-Wolska; Hector Vallés Varela; César Orús Dotú; Marcin Durko; Alicia Huarte Irujo; Bartosz Piszczatowski; Marek Zadrożniak; Colin Irwin; Petra L Graham; Josie Wyss
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Comprehensive Hearing Aid Intervention at a Free Subspecialty Clinic.

Authors:  Aileen P Wertz; Gregory Mannarelli; Andrew G Shuman; Erin L McKean
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Bilateral use of active middle ear implants: speech discrimination results in noise.

Authors:  Astrid Wolf-Magele; Viktor Koci; Johannes Schnabl; Patrick Zorowka; Herbert Riechelmann; Georg Mathias Sprinzl
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Auditory reality and self-assessment of hearing.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

Review 8.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

9.  Stuart Gatehouse: a brief life.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

10.  The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception.

Authors:  Yuexin Cai; Fei Zhao; Yuebo Chen; Maojin Liang; Ling Chen; Haidi Yang; Hao Xiong; Xueyuan Zhang; Yiqing Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.