Literature DB >> 22894221

Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users.

Christina Fuller1, Rolien Free, Bert Maat, Deniz Başkent.   

Abstract

In normal-hearing listeners, musical background has been observed to change the sound representation in the auditory system and produce enhanced performance in some speech perception tests. Based on these observations, it has been hypothesized that musical background can influence sound and speech perception, and as an extension also the quality of life, by cochlear-implant users. To test this hypothesis, this study explored musical background [using the Dutch Musical Background Questionnaire (DMBQ)], and self-perceived sound and speech perception and quality of life [using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and the Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)] in 98 postlingually deafened adult cochlear-implant recipients. In addition to self-perceived measures, speech perception scores (percentage of phonemes recognized in words presented in quiet) were obtained from patient records. The self-perceived hearing performance was associated with the objective speech perception. Forty-one respondents (44% of 94 respondents) indicated some form of formal musical training. Fifteen respondents (18% of 83 respondents) judged themselves as having musical training, experience, and knowledge. No association was observed between musical background (quantified by DMBQ), and self-perceived hearing-related performance or quality of life (quantified by NCIQ and SSQ), or speech perception in quiet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894221     DOI: 10.1121/1.4730910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; H Richard Droghini; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; Etienne Gaudrain; Jeanne N Clarke; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-30

3.  Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; John J Galvin; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Javier Gavilán; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Rosa M Pérez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Jesús Díez-Sebastián; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12.

Authors:  William Noble; Niels Søgaard Jensen; Graham Naylor; Navjot Bhullar; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Cochlear Implantation Improves Both Speech Perception and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Prospective Follow-Up Study of Treatment Benefits among Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Kasper Møller Boje Rasmussen; Niels Cramer West; Michael Bille; Matilde Grønborg Sandvej; Per Cayé-Thomasen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; John J Galvin; Bert Maat; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.