Literature DB >> 20874047

Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods.

Gurjit Singh1, M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller.   

Abstract

The purposes of the study were to examine the test-retest properties of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) and to determine if the method of test administration affected these properties. Four groups of 40 older adult participants completed the SSQ twice at an interval of about a half year, using either the same or different administration methods at the two test times. The SSQ was administered using an interview method and/or it was self-administered and then returned by mail. Although the method of test administration did not systematically affect scores on the SSQ, the highest test-retest correlation (r = 0.83) was observed using the interview method at both test times, making it the best choice for the purpose of demonstrating the effectiveness of interventions. The other three combinations of dual-administration in this study also provided reliable results and may be preferable because the self-administration method is less time-consuming and labour-intensive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20874047     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.491097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  23 in total

1.  Self-assessed hearing abilities in middle- and older-age adults: a stratified sampling approach.

Authors:  William Noble; Graham Naylor; Navjot Bhullar; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Neural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly A Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10

5.  Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.

Authors:  Noël Y Dwyer; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Improvement in Patient-reported Hearing After Treatment With Bevacizumab in People With Neurofibromatosis Type 2.

Authors:  Victoria Huang; Amanda L Bergner; Chris Halpin; Vanessa L Merker; Monica R Sheridan; Brigitte C Widemann; Jaishri O Blakeley; Scott R Plotkin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover; Michael Blackburn; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12.

Authors:  William Noble; Niels Søgaard Jensen; Graham Naylor; Navjot Bhullar; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Test-Retest Reliability of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Xuyang Zhang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  The use of research questionnaires with hearing impaired adults: online vs. paper-and-pencil administration.

Authors:  Elisabet Sundewall Thorén; Gerhard Andersson; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2012-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.