Literature DB >> 16938784

Two-eared listening in dynamic situations.

Stuart Gatehouse1, Michael Akeroyd.   

Abstract

Reports of hearing disabilities, particularly those acoustically and perceptually dynamic circumstances, are associated with compromised binaural capacities. Those disabilities that are compromised largely correspond to the areas where benefits of bilateral fitting over unilateral fitting emerge. The singular exception is for disabilities in "Sound quality and naturalness". When binaural capacities are measured by traditional static masking level difference paradigms, relationships between compromised binaural capacity and self-reports of disability are largely absent. However, when masking level differences are assessed using dynamic parameters that are more representative of the conditions experienced in everyday living then significant associations between binaural capacities and self-reports of disability do emerge. We contend that, for both the self-report domain and the psychoacoustical domain, procedures should be more properly representative of the dynamic environments that listeners are routinely exposed to.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938784     DOI: 10.1080/14992020600783103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  25 in total

1.  The effects of cueing temporal and spatial attention on word recognition in a complex listening task in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

2.  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.

Authors:  Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Laura K Holden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The effects of short-term computerized speech-in-noise training on postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Brienne Lee; Pamela Fiebig; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Self-assessed hearing abilities in middle- and older-age adults: a stratified sampling approach.

Authors:  William Noble; Graham Naylor; Navjot Bhullar; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Hearing Impairment and Quality of Life in Adults with Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation.

Authors:  Ignacio Sanhueza; Raquel Manrique-Huarte; Diego Calavia; Alicia Huarte; Manuel Manrique
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

7.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10

Review 8.  Auditory reality and self-assessment of hearing.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

Review 9.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

10.  Stuart Gatehouse: a brief life.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.