Literature DB >> 23644470

Effect of nuclear architecture on the efficiency of double-strand break repair.

Neta Agmon1, Batia Liefshitz, Christophe Zimmer, Emmanuelle Fabre, Martin Kupiec.   

Abstract

The most dangerous insults to the genome's integrity are those that break both strands of the DNA. Double-strand breaks can be repaired by homologous recombination; in this conserved mechanism, a global genomic homology search finds sequences similar to those near the break, and uses them as a template for DNA synthesis and ligation. Chromosomes occupy restricted territories within the nucleus. We show that yeast genomic regions whose nuclear territories overlap recombine more efficiently than sequences located in spatially distant territories. Tethering of telomeres and centromeres reduces the efficiency of recombination between distant genomic loci, lowering the chances of non-allelic recombination. Our results challenge present models that posit an active scanning of the whole nuclear volume by the broken chromosomal end; they demonstrate that the search for homology is a limiting step in homologous recombination, and emphasize the importance of nuclear organization in genome maintenance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644470     DOI: 10.1038/ncb2745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  39 in total

1.  Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery.

Authors:  Vincent Dion; Véronique Kalck; Chihiro Horigome; Benjamin D Towbin; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 2.  The budding yeast nucleus.

Authors:  Angela Taddei; Heiko Schober; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Evi Soutoglou; Jonas F Dorn; Kundan Sengupta; Maria Jasin; Andre Nussenzweig; Thomas Ried; Gaudenz Danuser; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  High-resolution statistical mapping reveals gene territories in live yeast.

Authors:  Axel B Berger; Ghislain G Cabal; Emmanuelle Fabre; Tarn Duong; Henri Buc; Ulf Nehrbass; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Olivier Gadal; Christophe Zimmer
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  KAP-1 phosphorylation regulates CHD3 nucleosome remodeling during the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Aaron A Goodarzi; Thomas Kurka; Penelope A Jeggo
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Physical mapping of large DNA by chromosome fragmentation.

Authors:  D Vollrath; R W Davis; C Connelly; P Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Distributive disjunction of authentic chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  V Guacci; D B Kaback
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Single-molecule imaging of DNA pairing by RecA reveals a three-dimensional homology search.

Authors:  Anthony L Forget; Stephen C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Telomere anchoring at the nuclear periphery requires the budding yeast Sad1-UNC-84 domain protein Mps3.

Authors:  Jennifer M Bupp; Adriana E Martin; Elizabeth S Stensrud; Sue L Jaspersen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation by Rtt109 is crucial for chromosome positioning.

Authors:  Shin-Ichiro Hiraga; Sotirios Botsios; Anne D Donaldson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of recombination and genomic maintenance.

Authors:  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Chromosome position determines the success of double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Cheng-Sheng Lee; Ruoxi W Wang; Hsiao-Han Chang; Daniel Capurso; Mark R Segal; James E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA damage signalling targets the kinetochore to promote chromatin mobility.

Authors:  Jonathan Strecker; Gagan D Gupta; Wei Zhang; Mikhail Bashkurov; Marie-Claude Landry; Laurence Pelletier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Cohesin and the nucleolus constrain the mobility of spontaneous repair foci.

Authors:  Vincent Dion; Véronique Kalck; Andrew Seeber; Thomas Schleker; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Frequency of DNA end joining in trans is not determined by the predamage spatial proximity of double-strand breaks in yeast.

Authors:  Sham Sunder; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Recombination at subtelomeres is regulated by physical distance, double-strand break resection and chromatin status.

Authors:  Amandine Batté; Clémentine Brocas; Hélène Bordelet; Antoine Hocher; Myriam Ruault; Adouda Adjiri; Angela Taddei; Karine Dubrana
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Chromatin stiffening underlies enhanced locus mobility after DNA damage in budding yeast.

Authors:  Sébastien Herbert; Alice Brion; Jean-Michel Arbona; Mickaël Lelek; Adeline Veillet; Benoît Lelandais; Jyotsana Parmar; Fabiola García Fernández; Etienne Almayrac; Yasmine Khalil; Eleonore Birgy; Emmanuelle Fabre; Christophe Zimmer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Chromosome-refolding model of mating-type switching in yeast.

Authors:  Barış Avşaroğlu; Gabriel Bronk; Kevin Li; James E Haber; Jane Kondev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Remodelers move chromatin in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Andrew Seeber; Vincent Dion; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  The Conformation of Yeast Chromosome III Is Mating Type Dependent and Controlled by the Recombination Enhancer.

Authors:  Jon-Matthew Belton; Bryan R Lajoie; Sylvain Audibert; Sylvain Cantaloube; Imen Lassadi; Isabelle Goiffon; Davide Baù; Marc A Marti-Renom; Kerstin Bystricky; Job Dekker
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.