Literature DB >> 21910560

The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality.

Sarah J White1, Adrian Staub.   

Abstract

Participants' eye movements were recorded as they read single sentences presented normally, presented entirely in faint text, or presented normally except for a single faint word. Fixations were longer when the entire sentence was faint than when the sentence was presented normally. In addition, fixations were much longer on a single faint word embedded in normal text, compared to when the entire sentence was faint. The primary aim of the study was to examine the influence of stimulus quality on the distribution of fixation durations. Ex-Gaussian fitting revealed that stimulus quality affected the mean of the Normal component, but in contrast to results from single-word tasks (Plourde & Besner, 1997), stimulus quality did not affect the exponential component, regardless of whether one or all words were faint. The results also contrast with the finding (Staub, White, Drieghe, Hollway, & Rayner, 2010) that the word frequency effect on fixation durations is an effect on both of the critical distributional parameters. These findings are argued to have implications for the interpretation of the role of stimulus quality in word recognition, and for models of eye movement control in reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21910560     DOI: 10.1037/a0025338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

2.  Revisiting Huey: on the importance of the upper part of words during reading.

Authors:  Manuel Perea
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

3.  Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Ashley Benatar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Pace Yourself: Intraindividual Variability in Context Use Revealed by Self-paced Event-related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading.

Authors:  Guojie Ma; Xingshan Li; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

9.  Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye-movements during reading.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Sarah Risse; Timothy Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-01

10.  Estimating the divergence point: a novel distributional analysis procedure for determining the onset of the influence of experimental variables.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.