Literature DB >> 16977449

LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading.

R H S Carpenter1, Scott A McDonald.   

Abstract

When saccades are evoked by suddenly presented visual stimuli, the stochastic distribution of their reaction times is typically recinormal, in conformity with the LATER model of decision-making, sometimes with an additional sub-population of early responses. In the real world, saccades are more often spontaneous responses to static features of the visual world; nevertheless, the time between the end of one saccade and the start of the next may be regarded as a reaction time to the new image that is presented to the retina. The distribution of these times is qualitatively similar to that of evoked saccades, but typically with a longer median and more of the early responses. Here, we analyse the statistical distributions of fixation times from a large database of spontaneous saccades made while reading and show that the distributions are altered in characteristic ways by particular features of the current fixation: likely familiarity of the currently fixated word, and its proximity to the preceding fixation. These alterations are of the kind predicted by LATER: familiarity appears to influence the mean rate at which the decision signal approaches completion, whereas proximity to the previous fixation, presumably because it provides partial prior information about the upcoming word, appears to increase prior probability. We conclude that spontaneous saccades may be successfully described by the same decision-making model that can be used for evoked ones.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16977449     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0666-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  The influence of urgency on decision time.

Authors:  B A Reddi; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect.

Authors:  F Vitu; G W McConkie; P Kerr; J K O'Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency; evidence for independence of detection and decision.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  Scott A McDonald; R H S Carpenter; Richard C Shillcock
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

8.  Mathematical modelling of reaction latency: the structure of the models and its motivation.

Authors:  A Pacut
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.579

9.  Probability summation over time.

Authors:  A B Watson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Neural control of voluntary movement initiation.

Authors:  D P Hanes; J D Schall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  A single mechanism for the timing of spontaneous and evoked saccades.

Authors:  J C P Roos; D M Calandrini; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Ashley Benatar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

3.  Saccadic latency in Parkinson's disease correlates with executive function and brain atrophy, but not motor severity.

Authors:  Robert Perneczky; Boyd C P Ghosh; Laura Hughes; Roger H S Carpenter; Roger A Barker; James B Rowe
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.996

4.  Action selection: a race model for selected and non-selected actions distinguishes the contribution of premotor and prefrontal areas.

Authors:  J B Rowe; L Hughes; I Nimmo-Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Revisiting corrective saccades: role of visual feedback.

Authors:  Jing Tian; Howard S Ying; David S Zee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Reversed Procrastination by Focal Disruption of Medial Frontal Cortex.

Authors:  Ashwani Jha; Beate Diehl; Catherine Scott; Andrew W McEvoy; Parashkev Nachev
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Aging Effects and Test-Retest Reliability of Inhibitory Control for Saccadic Eye Movements.

Authors:  Martyna Beata Płomecka; Zofia Barańczuk-Turska; Christian Pfeiffer; Nicolas Langer
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-09-29

8.  Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Kay H Brodersen; Will D Penny; Lee M Harrison; Jean Daunizeau; Christian C Ruff; Emrah Duzel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-09-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.