Literature DB >> 23629411

Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?

Rudy M Jonker, Anja Guenther, Leif Engqvist, Tim Schmoll.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23629411     DOI： 10.1038/nmeth.2439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN： 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Max Wolf; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  The standardization-generalization dilemma: a way out.

Authors:  F Josef van der Staay; S S Arndt; R E Nordquist
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments?

Authors:  S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments.

Authors:  S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner; Corinna Auer; Joachim Kunert; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  "Personality" in laboratory mice used for biomedical research: a way of understanding variability?

Authors:  Lars Lewejohann; Benjamin Zipser; Norbert Sachser
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Effect of population heterogenization on the reproducibility of mouse behavior: a multi-laboratory study.

Authors:  S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner; Benjamin Zipser; Lars Lewejohann; Norbert Sachser; Chadi Touma; Britta Schindler; Sabine Chourbaji; Christiane Brandwein; Peter Gass; Niek van Stipdonk; Johanneke van der Harst; Berry Spruijt; Vootele Võikar; David P Wolfer; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  The way you say it.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Reply to: "Reanalysis of Richter et al. (2010) on reproducibility".

Authors:  Hanno Würbel; S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Reanalysis of Richter et al. (2010) on reproducibility.

Authors:  Russell D Wolfinger
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Authors:  Bernhard Voelkl; Naomi S Altman; Anders Forsman; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Jessica Gurevitch; Ivana Jaric; Natasha A Karp; Martien J Kas; Holger Schielzeth; Tom Van de Casteele; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Systematic heterogenization for better reproducibility in animal experimentation.

Authors:  S Helene Richter
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 12.625

6.  Power to the People: Power, Negative Results and Sample Size.

Authors:  Brianna N Gaskill; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Selective increases in inter-individual variability in response to environmental enrichment in female mice.

Authors:  Julia C Körholz; Sara Zocher; Anna N Grzyb; Benjamin Morisse; Alexandra Poetzsch; Fanny Ehret; Christopher Schmied; Gerd Kempermann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.140
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.