Literature DB >> 32488205

Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Bernhard Voelkl1, Naomi S Altman2, Anders Forsman3, Wolfgang Forstmeier4, Jessica Gurevitch5, Ivana Jaric1, Natasha A Karp6, Martien J Kas7, Holger Schielzeth8, Tom Van de Casteele9, Hanno Würbel10.   

Abstract

Context-dependent biological variation presents a unique challenge to the reproducibility of results in experimental animal research, because organisms' responses to experimental treatments can vary with both genotype and environmental conditions. In March 2019, experts in animal biology, experimental design and statistics convened in Blonay, Switzerland, to discuss strategies addressing this challenge. In contrast to the current gold standard of rigorous standardization in experimental animal research, we recommend the use of systematic heterogenization of study samples and conditions by actively incorporating biological variation into study design through diversifying study samples and conditions. Here we provide the scientific rationale for this approach in the hope that researchers, regulators, funders and editors can embrace this paradigm shift. We also present a road map towards better practices in view of improving the reproducibility of animal research.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32488205     DOI: 10.1038/s41583-020-0313-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci        ISSN: 1471-003X            Impact factor:   34.870


  102 in total

Review 1.  Principles for the buffering of genetic variation.

Authors:  J L Hartman; B Garvik; L Hartwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Parent guidance: psychotherapy of the young child via the parent.

Authors:  M Ack; E Beale; L Ware
Journal:  Bull Menninger Clin       Date:  1975-09

3.  Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

Authors:  Florian Prinz; Thomas Schlange; Khusru Asadullah
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Measurement error and the replication crisis.

Authors:  Eric Loken; Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Emergence of individuality in genetically identical mice.

Authors:  Julia Freund; Andreas M Brandmaier; Lars Lewejohann; Imke Kirste; Mareike Kritzler; Antonio Krüger; Norbert Sachser; Ulman Lindenberger; Gerd Kempermann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  What does research reproducibility mean?

Authors:  Steven N Goodman; Daniele Fanelli; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  A long journey to reproducible results.

Authors:  Gordon J Lithgow; Monica Driscoll; Patrick Phillips
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Lawrence A Tabak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research.

Authors:  Leonard P Freedman; Iain M Cockburn; Timothy S Simcoe
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species.

Authors:  A Forsman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  52 in total

1.  Highlights from the Era of Open Source Web-Based Tools.

Authors:  Kristin R Anderson; Julie A Harris; Lydia Ng; Pjotr Prins; Sara Memar; Bengt Ljungquist; Daniel Fürth; Robert W Williams; Giorgio A Ascoli; Dani Dumitriu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports.

Authors:  Randall J Ellis
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 3.  Learning-dependent neuronal activity across the larval zebrafish brain.

Authors:  Matthew Lovett-Barron
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  A reaction norm perspective on reproducibility.

Authors:  Bernhard Voelkl; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 1.919

5.  Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations for the Use of Single Prolonged Stress and Fear Extinction Retention in Rodents.

Authors:  Chantelle Ferland-Beckham; Lauren E Chaby; Nikolaos P Daskalakis; Dayan Knox; Israel Liberzon; Miranda M Lim; Christa McIntyre; Shane A Perrine; Victoria B Risbrough; Esther L Sabban; Andreas Jeromin; Magali Haas
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Characterization of the direct pathway in Dyt1 ΔGAG heterozygous knock-in mice and dopamine receptor 1-expressing-cell-specific Dyt1 conditional knockout mice.

Authors:  Fumiaki Yokoi; Huan-Xin Chen; Janneth Oleas; Mai Tu Dang; Hong Xing; Kelly M Dexter; Yuqing Li
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Standardized and reproducible measurement of decision-making in mice.

Authors:  Valeria Aguillon-Rodriguez; Dora Angelaki; Hannah Bayer; Niccolo Bonacchi; Matteo Carandini; Fanny Cazettes; Gaelle Chapuis; Anne K Churchland; Yang Dan; Eric Dewitt; Mayo Faulkner; Hamish Forrest; Laura Haetzel; Michael Häusser; Sonja B Hofer; Fei Hu; Anup Khanal; Christopher Krasniak; Ines Laranjeira; Zachary F Mainen; Guido Meijer; Nathaniel J Miska; Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel; Masayoshi Murakami; Jean-Paul Noel; Alejandro Pan-Vazquez; Cyrille Rossant; Joshua Sanders; Karolina Socha; Rebecca Terry; Anne E Urai; Hernando Vergara; Miles Wells; Christian J Wilson; Ilana B Witten; Lauren E Wool; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Investigating the role of striatal dopamine receptor 2 in motor coordination and balance: Insights into the pathogenesis of DYT1 dystonia.

Authors:  Yuning Liu; Hong Xing; Fumiaki Yokoi; David E Vaillancourt; Yuqing Li
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Abnormal cerebellar function and tremor in a mouse model for non-manifesting partially penetrant dystonia type 6.

Authors:  Meike E van der Heijden; Dominic J Kizek; Ross Perez; Elena K Ruff; Michelle E Ehrlich; Roy V Sillitoe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Internal consistency and compatibility of the 3Rs and 3Vs principles for project evaluation of animal research.

Authors:  Matthias Eggel; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.