Literature DB >> 20195246

Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments.

S Helene Richter1, Joseph P Garner, Corinna Auer, Joachim Kunert, Hanno Würbel.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20195246     DOI： 10.1038/nmeth0310-167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN： 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Behaviour and the standardization fallacy.

Authors:  H Würbel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments?

Authors:  S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Questioning standardization in science.

Authors:  Richard Paylor
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment.

Authors:  J C Crabbe; D Wahlsten; B C Dudek
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms.

Authors:  Jennie E Larkin; Bryan C Frank; Haralambos Gavras; Razvan Sultana; John Quackenbush
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 28.547
  5 in total
  70 in total

Review 1.  Environmental enrichment of laboratory rodents: the answer depends on the question.

Authors:  Linda A Toth; Kevin Kregel; Lisa Leon; Timothy I Musch
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  A glass full of optimism: enrichment effects on cognitive bias in a rat model of depression.

Authors:  Sophie Helene Richter; Anita Schick; Carolin Hoyer; Katja Lankisch; Peter Gass; Barbara Vollmayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Clarifying the terminology that describes scientific reproducibility.

Authors:  Ron S Kenett; Galit Shmueli
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  More than 3Rs: the importance of scientific validity for harm-benefit analysis of animal research.

Authors:  Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

5.  Measuring behavior of animal models: faults and remedies.

Authors:  Ehud Fonio; Ilan Golani; Yoav Benjamini
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Reply to: "Reanalysis of Richter et al. (2010) on reproducibility".

Authors:  Hanno Würbel; S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Reanalysis of Richter et al. (2010) on reproducibility.

Authors:  Russell D Wolfinger
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?

Authors:  Rudy M Jonker; Anja Guenther; Leif Engqvist; Tim Schmoll
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Authors:  Bernhard Voelkl; Naomi S Altman; Anders Forsman; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Jessica Gurevitch; Ivana Jaric; Natasha A Karp; Martien J Kas; Holger Schielzeth; Tom Van de Casteele; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Localized fetomaternal hyperglycemia: spatial and kinetic definition by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jianrong Yao; Chunlin Wang; Susan A Walsh; Shanming Hu; Alexander B Sawatzke; Diana Dang; Jeffrey L Segar; Laura L B Ponto; John J Sunderland; Andrew W Norris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.