Literature DB >> 24161967

The way you say it.

.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24161967     DOI： 10.1038/nmeth.2686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN： 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE.

Authors:  W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The ENCODE project: missteps overshadowing a success.

Authors:  Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?

Authors:  Rudy M Jonker; Anja Guenther; Leif Engqvist; Tim Schmoll
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  On the immortality of television sets: "function" in the human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE.

Authors:  Dan Graur; Yichen Zheng; Nicholas Price; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Rebecca A Zufall; Eran Elhaik
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.