Literature DB >> 23629410

Reanalysis of Richter et al. (2010) on reproducibility.

Russell D Wolfinger.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23629410     DOI： 10.1038/nmeth.2438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN： 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments.

Authors:  S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner; Corinna Auer; Joachim Kunert; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?

Authors:  Rudy M Jonker; Anja Guenther; Leif Engqvist; Tim Schmoll
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 28.547
  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  Reply to: "Reanalysis of Richter et al. (2010) on reproducibility".

Authors:  Hanno Würbel; S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Authors:  Bernhard Voelkl; Naomi S Altman; Anders Forsman; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Jessica Gurevitch; Ivana Jaric; Natasha A Karp; Martien J Kas; Holger Schielzeth; Tom Van de Casteele; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Systematic heterogenization for better reproducibility in animal experimentation.

Authors:  S Helene Richter
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 12.625

4.  Heterogenising study samples across testing time improves reproducibility of behavioural data.

Authors:  Carina Bodden; Vanessa Tabea von Kortzfleisch; Fabian Karwinkel; Sylvia Kaiser; Norbert Sachser; S Helene Richter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.