Literature DB >> 23625383

Stimulating the cerebellum affects visuomotor adaptation but not intermanual transfer of learning.

Hannah Block1, Pablo Celnik.   

Abstract

When systematic movement errors occur, the brain responds with a systematic change in motor behavior. This type of adaptive motor learning can transfer intermanually; adaptation of movements of the right hand in response to training with a perturbed visual signal (visuomotor adaptation) may carry over to the left hand. While visuomotor adaptation has been studied extensively, it is unclear whether the cerebellum, a structure involved in adaptation, is important for intermanual transfer as well. We addressed this question with three experiments in which subjects reached with their right hands as a 30° visuomotor rotation was introduced. Subjects received anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation on the trained (experiment 1) or untrained (experiment 2) hemisphere of the cerebellum, or, for comparison, motor cortex (M1). After the training period, subjects reached with their left hand, without visual feedback, to assess intermanual transfer of learning aftereffects. Stimulation of the right cerebellum caused faster adaptation, but none of the stimulation sites affected transfer. To ascertain whether cerebellar stimulation would increase transfer if subjects learned faster as well as a larger amount, in experiment 3 anodal and sham cerebellar groups experienced a shortened training block such that the anodal group learned more than sham. Despite the difference in adaptation magnitude, transfer was similar across these groups, although smaller than in experiment 1. Our results suggest that intermanual transfer of visuomotor learning does not depend on cerebellar activity and that the number of movements performed at plateau is an important predictor of transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23625383      PMCID: PMC3779504          DOI: 10.1007/s12311-013-0486-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  67 in total

1.  Mirror Writing: Learning, Transfer, and Implications for Internal Inverse Models.

Authors:  Mark L. Latash
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning.

Authors:  M Ghilardi; C Ghez; V Dhawan; J Moeller; M Mentis; T Nakamura; A Antonini; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Inter- and intra-limb generalization of adaptation during catching.

Authors:  S M Morton; C E Lang; A J Bastian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Fronto-parieto-cerebellar interaction associated with intermanual transfer of monkey tool-use learning.

Authors:  Shigeru Obayashi; Tetsuya Suhara; Koichi Kawabe; Takashi Okauchi; Jun Maeda; Yuji Nagai; Atsushi Iriki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The human dorsal premotor cortex generates on-line error corrections during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Ji-Hang Lee; Paul van Donkelaar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information.

Authors:  J I Laszlo; R A Baguley; P J Bairstow
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Neural basis of motor control and its cognitive implications.

Authors:  E Bizzi; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Degree of handedness affects intermanual transfer of skill learning.

Authors:  Cori Chase; Rachael Seidler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  48 in total

1.  Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Shirin Mahdavi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Mohammad-Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Hamed Ekhtiari; Mohammad Darainy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Performing a reaching task with one arm while adapting to a visuomotor rotation with the other can lead to complete transfer of motor learning across the arms.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy.

Authors:  Gabriela Cantarero; Danny Spampinato; Janine Reis; Loni Ajagbe; Tziporah Thompson; Kopal Kulkarni; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cerebellar-M1 Connectivity Changes Associated with Motor Learning Are Somatotopic Specific.

Authors:  Danny A Spampinato; Hannah J Block; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Mechanistic determinants of effector-independent motor memory encoding.

Authors:  Adarsh Kumar; Gaurav Panthi; Rechu Divakar; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Acute and repetitive fronto-cerebellar tDCS stimulation improves mood in non-depressed participants.

Authors:  Simon Newstead; Hayley Young; David Benton; Gabriela Jiga-Boy; Maria L Andrade Sienz; R M Clement; Frédéric Boy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in older adults.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories.

Authors:  David J Herzfeld; Damien Pastor; Adrian M Haith; Yves Rossetti; Reza Shadmehr; Jacinta O'Shea
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.