Literature DB >> 18592225

Degree of handedness affects intermanual transfer of skill learning.

Cori Chase1, Rachael Seidler.   

Abstract

Intermanual transfer of skill learning has often been used as a paradigm to study functional specialization and hemispheric interactions in relation to handedness. This literature has not evaluated whether degree of handedness impacts learning and intermanual transfer. Because handedness scores are related to factors that might influence intermanual transfer, such as engagement of the ipsilateral hemisphere during movement (Dassonville et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:14015-14018, 1997) and corpus callosum volume (Witelson in Science 229:665-668, 1985; Brain 112:799-835, 1989), we tested whether degree of handedness is correlated with transfer magnitude. We had groups of left and right handed participants perform a sensorimotor adaptation task and a sequence learning task. Following learning with either the dominant or nondominant hand, participants transferred to task performance with the other hand. We evaluated whether the magnitude of learning and intermanual transfer were influenced by either direction and/or degree of handedness. Participants exhibited faster sensorimotor adaptation with the right hand, regardless of whether they were right or left handed. In addition, less strongly left handed individuals exhibited better intermanual transfer of sensorimotor adaptation, while less strongly right handed individuals exhibited better intermanual transfer of sequence learning. The findings suggest that involvement of the ipsilateral hemisphere during learning may influence intermanual transfer magnitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18592225      PMCID: PMC2570758          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1472-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

1.  Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning.

Authors:  M Ghilardi; C Ghez; V Dhawan; J Moeller; M Mentis; T Nakamura; A Antonini; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Inter- and intra-limb generalization of adaptation during catching.

Authors:  S M Morton; C E Lang; A J Bastian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Pure perceptual-based sequence learning.

Authors:  Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series.

Authors:  N Teasdale; C Bard; M Fleury; D E Young; L Proteau
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information.

Authors:  J I Laszlo; R A Baguley; P J Bairstow
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action.

Authors:  M Jueptner; K M Stephan; C D Frith; D J Brooks; R S Frackowiak; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; N Iwasaki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  18 in total

1.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Interference between adaptation to double steps and adaptation to rotated feedback in spite of differences in directional selectivity.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with altered activity-dependent modulation of short-interval intracortical inhibition in bilateral M1.

Authors:  Olivier Morin-Moncet; Alexandre Latulipe-Loiselle; Jean-Marc Therrien-Blanchet; Hugo Theoret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Proprioceptive target matching asymmetries in left-handed individuals.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Brittany C Noble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Asymmetrical intermanual transfer of learning in a sensorimotor task.

Authors:  Waldemar Kirsch; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of laparoscopic instrument and finger on force perception: a first step towards laparoscopic force-skills training.

Authors:  M S Raghu Prasad; M Manivannan; S M Chandramohan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Direct coupling of haptic signals between hands.

Authors:  Lucile Dupin; Vincent Hayward; Mark Wexler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Improving motor performance without training: the effect of combining mirror visual feedback with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Erik von Rein; Maike Hoff; Elisabeth Kaminski; Bernhard Sehm; Christopher J Steele; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Neural correlates of motor learning, transfer of learning, and learning to learn.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.230

10.  Visuomotor adaptive improvement and aftereffects are impaired differentially following cerebellar lesions in SCA and PICA territory.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Otmar Bock; Elke R Gizewski; Beate Schoch; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.