Literature DB >> 515196

Qualitative differences among sweeteners.

S S Schiffman, D A Reilly, T B Clark.   

Abstract

Seventeen sweeteners varying widely in chemical structure were arranged in a three-dimensional space by two multidimensional scaling procedures, INDSCAL and ALSCAL. Fructose, glucose, sorbose, xylitol and xylose tended to fall near one another. Two sweeteners with a syrupy component, maltose and sorbitol, fell further away. Ca cyclamate and the dipeptide aspartame were the two artificial sweeteners which fell closest to and thus tasted most like the sugars. The proteins monellin and thaumatin, as well as the chalcone glycoside, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, all have long aftertastes and thus tended to fall proximate to one another. Stimuli with the highest metallic and bitter ratings (acetosulfan, sodium saccharin, rebaudioside and stevioside) tended to fall near one another with the amino acid d-tryptophan located a little farther away. Adjective scales were related to the spatial arrangement. Wide variability in the patterns of intensity ratings over subjects suggests that the sweet taste may be mediated by several peripheral receptor mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 515196     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(79)90113-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  17 in total

1.  The effectiveness of different sweeteners in suppressing citric acid sourness.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein; J E Frijters
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

Review 2.  The Macronutrients, Appetite, and Energy Intake.

Authors:  Alicia L Carreiro; Jaapna Dhillon; Susannah Gordon; Kelly A Higgins; Ashley G Jacobs; Breanna M McArthur; Benjamin W Redan; Rebecca L Rivera; Leigh R Schmidt; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 3.  Evaluation of Sweetener Synergy in Humans by Isobole Analyses.

Authors:  M Michelle Reyes; Stephen A Gravina; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Rats fail to discriminate quinine from denatonium: implications for the neural coding of bitter-tasting compounds.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Stacy L Kopka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger; Ryan W Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-07-02

6.  Category scales of sweetness are consistent with sweetness-matching data.

Authors:  R L McBride
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-08

7.  Sucrose-predictive cues evoke greater phasic dopamine release than saccharin-predictive cues.

Authors:  James E McCutcheon; Jeff A Beeler; Mitchell F Roitman
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior?

Authors:  John E Hayes; Emma L Feeney; Alissa L Allen
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.565

10.  Odor representations in the olfactory bulb evolve after the first breath and persist as an odor afterimage.

Authors:  Michael Andrew Patterson; Samuel Lagier; Alan Carleton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.