Literature DB >> 28923290

Use of Adult Sensory Panel to Study Individual Differences in the Palatability of a Pediatric HIV Treatment Drug.

Julie A Mennella1, Phoebe S Mathew2, Elizabeth D Lowenthal3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The recommended first-line treatment for young children infected with HIV includes the liquid formulation of the co-formulated protease inhibitors lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra® [Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois]). Clinical reports indicate that some children readily accept the taste of Kaletra, whereas others strongly reject it, which can deter therapeutic adherence and outcomes.
METHODS: As a proof-of-concept approach, a sensory panel of genotyped adults was used to document the range of individual differences in the taste and palatability (hedonics) of the liquid formulation of Kaletra and other taste stimuli, including common excipients. Panelists rated taste sensations using generalized labeled magnitude scales to determine genotype-phenotype relationships. Several months later, the panelists were retested to assess response reliability.
FINDINGS: Not all panelists had the same sensory experience when tasting Kaletra. Palatability ratings varied widely, from moderate like to strongest imaginable dislike, and were reliable over time. The more irritating and bitter Kaletra tasted, the more disliked by the panelist. The more they disliked the taste of Kaletra, the more they disliked the taste of its excipient ethanol and the bitter stimulus denatonium. Those who experienced less bitter and sweeter taste sensations had a different genetic signature than the other panelists. Bitterness and irritation ratings of Kaletra varied by the orphaned bitter receptor gene (TAS2R60), whereas sweetness ratings of Kaletra varied according to the cold receptor gene (TRPM8), which is activated by menthol, an excipient of Kaletra. Neither genotype related to ratings for ethanol or denatonium, however. IMPLICATIONS: The use of a sensory panel holds promise as a first step in determining the nature of individual differences in the palatability of existing pediatric drug formulations and sources of variation. In this era of personalized medicine, the need is great to develop psychophysical tools to determine which drugs will show variation in acceptance by children and whether patterns of individual variation in taste as assessed by adults mirror those of young patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01841710.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult sensory panel; candidate genes; hedonics; liquid formulation; pediatric drug; taste

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28923290      PMCID: PMC5654675          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  65 in total

Review 1.  Extrasensory perception: odorant and taste receptors beyond the nose and mouth.

Authors:  Simon R Foster; Eugeni Roura; Walter G Thomas
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 12.310

2.  Problems with oral formulations prescribed to children: a focus group study of healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Rebecca Venables; Heather Stirling; Hannah Batchelor; John Marriott
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Genetic analysis of a complex trait in the Utah Genetic Reference Project: a major locus for PTC taste ability on chromosome 7q and a secondary locus on chromosome 16p.

Authors:  Dennis Drayna; Hilary Coon; Un-Kyung Kim; Tami Elsner; Kevin Cromer; Brith Otterud; Lisa Baird; Andy P Peiffer; Mark Leppert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Taste and smell GPCRs in the lung: Evidence for a previously unrecognized widespread chemosensory system.

Authors:  Steven S An; Stephen B Liggett
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 4.315

5.  Formulation factors affecting acceptability of oral medicines in children.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Sejal Ranmal; Hannah K Batchelor; Mine Orlu-Gul; Terry B Ernest; Iwan W Thomas; Talia Flanagan; Richard Kendall; Catherine Tuleu
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.875

6.  2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis.

Authors:  Douglas S Ross; Henry B Burch; David S Cooper; M Carol Greenlee; Peter Laurberg; Ana Luiza Maia; Scott A Rivkees; Mary Samuels; Julie Ann Sosa; Marius N Stan; Martin A Walter
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.568

7.  Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Bittering agents in the prevention of accidental poisoning: children's reactions to denatonium benzoate (Bitrex).

Authors:  J R Sibert; N Frude
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1991-03

Review 9.  How taste works: cells, receptors and gustatory perception.

Authors:  Dariusz Kikut-Ligaj; Joanna Trzcielińska-Lorych
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.787

10.  Comprehensive Analysis of Mouse Bitter Taste Receptors Reveals Different Molecular Receptive Ranges for Orthologous Receptors in Mice and Humans.

Authors:  Kristina Lossow; Sandra Hübner; Natacha Roudnitzky; Jay P Slack; Federica Pollastro; Maik Behrens; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  2 in total

1.  Time to treatment disruption in children with HIV-1 randomized to initial antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors versus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Authors:  Dwight E Yin; Christina Ludema; Stephen R Cole; Carol E Golin; William C Miller; Meredith G Warshaw; Ross E McKinney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Variation in TAS2R receptor genes explains differential bitterness of two common antibiotics.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E Hayes; Emma L Feeney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.772

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.