Literature DB >> 23597357

Effectiveness and reach of the FLU-FIT program in an integrated health care system: a multisite randomized trial.

Michael B Potter1, Lynn M Ackerson, Vicky Gomez, Judith M E Walsh, Lawrence W Green, Theodore R Levin, Carol P Somkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We tested the effectiveness of offering home fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) during influenza vaccination clinics to increase colorectal cancer screening (CRCS).
METHODS: In a clinical trial at Kaiser Permanente Northern California influenza clinics in Redwood City, Richmond, South San Francisco, Union City, and Fresno, we randomly assigned influenza clinic dates to intervention (FIT offered) or control (FIT not offered) and compared subsequent CRCS activity.
RESULTS: Clinic staff provided FITs to 53.9% (1805/3351) of intervention patients aged 50 to 75 years. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 26.9% (900/3351) and 11.7% (336/2884) of intervention and control patients completed an FIT, respectively, within 90 days of vaccination (P ≤ .001). The adjusted odds ratio for completing FIT in the intervention versus the control arm was 2.75 (95% confidence interval = 2.40, 3.16). In the per protocol analysis, 35.4% (648/1830) of patients given FIT and 13.3% (588/4405) of patients not given FIT completed FIT within 90 days of vaccination (P ≤ .001).
CONCLUSIONS: This intervention may increase CRCS among those not reached by other forms of CRCS outreach. Future research should include the extent to which these programs can be disseminated and implemented nationally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597357      PMCID: PMC3670663          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  14 in total

1.  Cancer screening - United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 2.  Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology.

Authors:  Lawrence W Green; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  External validity: we need to do more.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Lawrence W Green; Lisa M Klesges; David B Abrams; Edwin B Fisher; Michael G Goldstein; Laura L Hayman; Judith K Ockene; C Tracy Orleans
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-04

4.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Evelyn P Whitlock; Jennifer S Lin; Elizabeth Liles; Tracy L Beil; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Adaptation of the FLU-FOBT Program for a primary care clinic serving a low-income Chinese American community: new evidence of effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael B Potter; Tina M Yu; Ginny Gildengorin; Albert Y Yu; Kit Chan; Stephen J McPhee; Lawrence W Green; Judith M Walsh
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-02

Review 7.  Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems.

Authors:  Theodore R Levin; Laura Jamieson; Daniel A Burley; Juan Reyes; Michael Oehrli; Cindy Caldwell
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 8.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Rebecca Anhang Price; Caroline Cranos; Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

9.  The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT program in primary care a randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael B Potter; Judith M E Walsh; Tina M Yu; Ginny Gildengorin; Lawrence W Green; Stephen J McPhee
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Offering annual fecal occult blood tests at annual flu shot clinics increases colorectal cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Michael B Potter; La Phengrasamy; Esther S Hudes; Stephen J McPhee; Judith M E Walsh
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  11 in total

1.  Beyond Colonoscopy: The Role of Alternative Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer in Your Practice.

Authors:  Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Mailed Outreach Is Superior to Usual Care Alone for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the USA: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark Jager; Josh Demb; Ali Asghar; Kevin Selby; Evelyn Marquez Mello; Karen M Heskett; Alicea J Lieberman; Zhuo Geng; Balambal Bharti; Siddharth Singh; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jamie H Thompson; Amanda F Petrik; Denis B Nyongesa; Michael C Leo; Melissa Castillo; Brittany Younger; Anne Escaron; Alex Chen
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Latino-Based Community Health Center.

Authors:  Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; LeAnn Michaels; Jennifer S Rivelli; Melissa L Castillo; Brittany M Younger; Marta Castro; Sacha L Reich; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Determinants of Colorectal Cancer Screening among South Asian Americans.

Authors:  Arnab Mukherjea; Salma Shariff-Marco; Juan Yang; Winston Tseng; Latha Palaniappan; Jun Li; Susan L Ivey; Ma Somsouk; Scarlett Lin Gomez
Journal:  J Asian Health       Date:  2022-04

7.  Time to screening in the systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wang; Jean de Dieu Tapsoba; Melissa L Anderson; Sally W Vernon; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Patients.

Authors:  Alison T Brenner; Michael Dougherty; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 5.456

9.  Population health interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical tests: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Patrick Avila; Evans Whitaker; Stephen Bent; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Who Is Reached With Clinic In-Reach and Outreach Strategies to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening?

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.