Literature DB >> 21665058

The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT program in primary care a randomized trial.

Michael B Potter1, Judith M E Walsh, Tina M Yu, Ginny Gildengorin, Lawrence W Green, Stephen J McPhee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The FLU-FOBT Program is an intervention in which nurses provide home fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) to eligible patients during annual influenza vaccination (FLU) campaigns. The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT Program when implemented during primary care visits has not been extensively studied.
PURPOSE: The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT Program was tested as adapted for use during primary care visits in community clinics serving multiethnic patients with low baseline colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. During intervention weeks, nurses routinely initiated the offering of FOBT to eligible patients who were given FLU (FLU-FOBT group). During control weeks, nurses provided FOBT with FLU only when ordered by the primary care clinician during usual care (FLU-only group). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in six community clinics in San Francisco. Participants were patients aged 50-75 years who received FLU during primary care visits during an 18-week intervention beginning on September 28, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in CRC screening rates in the FLU-FOBT group compared to the FLU-only group at the end of the study period, on March 30, 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of becoming up-to-date with CRC screening.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed in 2010. A total of 695 participants received FLU on FLU-FOBT dates, and 677 received FLU on FLU-only dates. The CRC screening rate increased from 32.5% to 45.5% (+13.0 percentage points) in the FLU-FOBT group, and from 31.3% to 35.6% (+4.3 percentage points) in the FLU-only group (p=0.018 for change difference). For those due for CRC screening, the OR for completing CRC screening by the end of the measurement period was 2.22 (95% CI=1.24, 3.95) for the FLU-FOBT group compared to the FLU-only group.
CONCLUSIONS: FLU-FOBT Program participants were twice as likely to complete CRC screening as those receiving usual care. The FLU-FOBT Program is a practical strategy to increase CRC screening in community clinics. TRIAL REGISTRATION #: NCT01211379.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665058     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  25 in total

1.  The FLU-FOBT Program in community clinics: durable benefits of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Ginny Gildengorin; Lawrence W Green; Jason Jenkins; Michael B Potter
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-05-28

Review 2.  Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Daniel A Sussman; Chyke A Doubeni; Daniel S Anderson; Lukejohn Day; Amar R Deshpande; B Joseph Elmunzer; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Jeanette Mendez; Ma Somsouk; James Allison; Taft Bhuket; Zhuo Geng; Beverly B Green; Steven H Itzkowitz; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Third Annual Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Community Health Clinics.

Authors:  Connie L Arnold; Alfred Rademaker; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Jill Hancock; Terry C Davis
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2016-05

4.  Outreach and Inreach Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latinos at a Federally Qualified Health Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Sheila F Castañeda; Balambal Bharti; Marielena Rojas; Silvia Mercado; Adriana M Bearse; Jasmine Camacho; Manuel Song Lopez; Fatima Muñoz; Shawne O'Connell; Lin Liu; Gregory A Talavera; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  How can we boost colorectal and hepatocellular cancer screening among underserved populations?

Authors:  Melissa Goebel; Amit G Singal; Jesse Nodora; Sheila F Castañeda; Elena Martinez; Chyke Doubeni; Adeyinka Laiyemo; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-06

6.  Effectiveness and reach of the FLU-FIT program in an integrated health care system: a multisite randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael B Potter; Lynn M Ackerson; Vicky Gomez; Judith M E Walsh; Lawrence W Green; Theodore R Levin; Carol P Somkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Changes in Colorectal Cancer Screening Knowledge, Behavior, Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Barriers among Community Health Clinic Patients after a Health Literacy Intervention.

Authors:  Connie L Arnold; Alfred Rademaker; Dachao Liu; Terry C Davis
Journal:  J Community Med Health Educ       Date:  2017-01-13

8.  Implementation of an evidence-based intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening in community organizations: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Leda L Danao; Reggie T Cayetano; Catherine M Crespi; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Lay health educators increase colorectal cancer screening among Hmong Americans: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elisa K Tong; Tung T Nguyen; Penny Lo; Susan L Stewart; Ginny L Gildengorin; Janice Y Tsoh; Angela M Jo; Marjorie L Kagawa-Singer; Angela U Sy; Charlene Cuaresma; Hy T Lam; Ching Wong; Mi T Tran; Moon S Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Strategies to improve repeat fecal occult blood testing cancer screening.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Cristalyn Reynolds; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.