INTRODUCTION: We sought to adapt and evaluate the FLU-FOBT Program for a primary care clinic serving a low-income Chinese American community. METHODS: We compared colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) rate changes for patients who received flu shots versus those who did not receive flu shots during the FLU-FOBT Program. Analysis of data from the year prior to the intervention was used to validate the results. RESULTS: Rates of CRCS increased by 18.0 percentage points for flu shot recipients during the FLU-FOBT Program vs. 1.7 percentage points for flu shot non-recipients (p<.001 for change difference). In the year prior to the FLU-FOBT Program, flu shot recipients had only a 3.3 percentage point increase in the CRCS rate vs. a 1.9 percentage point decline for flu shot non-recipients (p=.08 for change difference). CONCLUSIONS: The FLU-FOBT Program as adapted was effective at increasing CRCS rates for primary care patients in this low-income Chinese American community.
INTRODUCTION: We sought to adapt and evaluate the FLU-FOBT Program for a primary care clinic serving a low-income Chinese American community. METHODS: We compared colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) rate changes for patients who received flu shots versus those who did not receive flu shots during the FLU-FOBT Program. Analysis of data from the year prior to the intervention was used to validate the results. RESULTS: Rates of CRCS increased by 18.0 percentage points for flu shot recipients during the FLU-FOBT Program vs. 1.7 percentage points for flu shot non-recipients (p<.001 for change difference). In the year prior to the FLU-FOBT Program, flu shot recipients had only a 3.3 percentage point increase in the CRCS rate vs. a 1.9 percentage point decline for flu shot non-recipients (p=.08 for change difference). CONCLUSIONS: The FLU-FOBT Program as adapted was effective at increasing CRCS rates for primary care patients in this low-income Chinese American community.
Authors: Michael B Potter; Lynn M Ackerson; Vicky Gomez; Judith M E Walsh; Lawrence W Green; Theodore R Levin; Carol P Somkin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Annette E Maxwell; Leda L Danao; Reggie T Cayetano; Catherine M Crespi; Roshan Bastani Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Tung T Nguyen; Janice Y Tsoh; Kent Woo; Susan L Stewart; Gem M Le; Adam Burke; Ginny Gildengorin; Rena J Pasick; Jun Wang; Elaine Chan; Lei-Chun Fung; Jane Jih; Stephen J McPhee Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Elisa K Tong; Tung T Nguyen; Penny Lo; Susan L Stewart; Ginny L Gildengorin; Janice Y Tsoh; Angela M Jo; Marjorie L Kagawa-Singer; Angela U Sy; Charlene Cuaresma; Hy T Lam; Ching Wong; Mi T Tran; Moon S Chen Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Melinda M Davis; Michele Freeman; Jackilen Shannon; Gloria D Coronado; Kurt C Stange; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Stephanie B Wheeler; David I Buckley Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 4.430