OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose (0.1 mmol/kg) peripheral magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 1.5 T using two-point Dixon fat suppression and compare it with conventional subtraction MRA in terms of image quality. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (13 male, 15 female; mean age ± standard deviation, 66 ± 16 years) with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease underwent subtractionless and subtraction first-pass MRA at 1.5 T using two-point Dixon fat suppression. Results were compared with regard to vessel-to-background contrast. A phantom study was performed to assess the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of both MRA techniques. Two experienced observers scored subjective image quality. Agreement regarding subjective image quality was expressed in quadratic weighted κ values. RESULTS: Vessel-to-background contrast improved in all anatomical locations with the subtractionless method versus the subtraction method (all P < 0.001). Subjective image quality was uniformly higher with the subtractionless method (all P < 0.03, except for the aorto-iliac arteries for observer 1, P = 0.052). SNR was 15 % higher with the subtractionless method (31.9 vs 27.6). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose lower extremity MRA. Moreover, both objective and subjective image quality are better than with subtraction MRA. KEY POINTS: • MRA is increasingly used for vascular applications. • Dixon imaging offers an alternative to image subtraction for fat suppression. • Subtractionless first-pass peripheral MRA is possible using two-point Dixon fat suppression. • Subtractionless peripheral MRA is possible at 1.5 T a single contrast medium dose. • Subtractionless first-pass peripheral MRA provides good image quality with few non-diagnostic studies.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose (0.1 mmol/kg) peripheral magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 1.5 T using two-point Dixon fat suppression and compare it with conventional subtraction MRA in terms of image quality. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (13 male, 15 female; mean age ± standard deviation, 66 ± 16 years) with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease underwent subtractionless and subtraction first-pass MRA at 1.5 T using two-point Dixon fat suppression. Results were compared with regard to vessel-to-background contrast. A phantom study was performed to assess the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of both MRA techniques. Two experienced observers scored subjective image quality. Agreement regarding subjective image quality was expressed in quadratic weighted κ values. RESULTS: Vessel-to-background contrast improved in all anatomical locations with the subtractionless method versus the subtraction method (all P < 0.001). Subjective image quality was uniformly higher with the subtractionless method (all P < 0.03, except for the aorto-iliac arteries for observer 1, P = 0.052). SNR was 15 % higher with the subtractionless method (31.9 vs 27.6). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose lower extremity MRA. Moreover, both objective and subjective image quality are better than with subtraction MRA. KEY POINTS: • MRA is increasingly used for vascular applications. • Dixon imaging offers an alternative to image subtraction for fat suppression. • Subtractionless first-pass peripheral MRA is possible using two-point Dixon fat suppression. • Subtractionless peripheral MRA is possible at 1.5 T a single contrast medium dose. • Subtractionless first-pass peripheral MRA provides good image quality with few non-diagnostic studies.
Authors: T Leiner; T T de Weert; R J Nijenhuis; G B Vasbinder; A G Kessels; K Y Ho; J M van Engelshoven Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Zhifei Wen; Huanzhou Yu; Angel R Pineda; Garry E Gold; Michael Markl; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tim Leiner; Alphons G H Kessels; Patricia J Nelemans; G Boudewijn C Vasbinder; Michiel W de Haan; Peter E J H M Kitslaar; Kai Yiu J A M Ho; Jan H M Tordoir; Joseph M A van Engelshoven Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Annette Hentsch; Manuela A Aschauer; Jörn O Balzer; Joachim Brossmann; Hans P Busch; Kirsten Davis; Philippe Douek; Franz Ebner; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Michaela Gregor; Christian Kersting; Patrick R Knüsel; Edward Leen; Tim Leiner; Christian Loewe; Simon McPherson; Peter Reimer; Fritz K W Schäfer; Matthias Taupitz; Siegfried A Thurnher; Bernd Tombach; Robin Wegener; Dominik Weishaupt; James F M Meaney Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-03-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mieke M P Driessen; Johannes M P J Breur; Ricardo P J Budde; Joep W M van Oorschot; Roland R J van Kimmenade; Gertjan Tj Sieswerda; Folkert J Meijboom; Tim Leiner Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2015-01-01
Authors: Casey P Johnson; Paul T Weavers; Eric A Borisch; Roger C Grimm; Thomas C Hulshizer; Christine C LaPlante; Phillip J Rossman; James F Glockner; Phillip M Young; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tristan C F van Heijst; Bram van Asselen; Ruud M Pijnappel; Marissa Cloos-van Balen; Jan J W Lagendijk; Desirée van den Bongard; Mariëlle E P Philippens Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Eric G Stinson; Joshua D Trzasko; Norbert G Campeau; James F Glockner; John Huston; Phillip M Young; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mahdi Salmani Rahimi; James H Holmes; Kang Wang; Scott B Reeder; Frank R Korosec Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Paul T Weavers; Eric A Borisch; Tom C Hulshizer; Phillip J Rossman; Phillip M Young; Casey P Johnson; Jessica McKay; Christopher C Cline; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-10-31 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Tilman Schubert; Peter Bannas; Sonja Kinner; Samir Sharma; James H Holmes; Mahdi Salmani Rahimi; Frank R Korosec; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Soultana Kourtidou; Marty R Jones; Ryan A Moore; Justin T Tretter; Nicholas J Ollberding; Eric J Crotty; Mantosh S Rattan; Robert J Fleck; Michael D Taylor Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 5.364