OBJECTIVE: In regional radiotherapy (RT) for patients with breast cancer, lymph node (LN) targets are delineated on CT, defined by anatomical boundaries. By identifying individual LNs, MRI-based delineations may reduce target volumes and thereby toxicity. We optimized MRI sequences for this purpose. Our aim was to evaluate the techniques for LN delineation in RT planning. METHODS: Supine MRI was explored at 1.5 T in RT position (arms in abduction). 5 MRI techniques were optimized in 10 and evaluated in 12 healthy female volunteers. The scans included one T1 weighted (T1w), three T2 weighted (T2w) and a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) technique. Quantitative evaluation was performed by scoring LN numbers per volunteer and per scan. Qualitatively, scans were assessed on seven aspects, including LN contrast, anatomical information and insensitivity to motion during acquisition. RESULTS: Two T2w fast spin-echo (FSE) methods showed the highest LN numbers (median 24 axillary), high contrast, excellent fat suppression and relative insensitivity to motion during acquisition. A third T2w sequence and DWI showed significantly fewer LNs (14 and 10) and proved unsuitable due to motion sensitivity and geometrical uncertainties. T1w MRI showed an intermediate number of LNs (17), provided valuable anatomical information, but lacked LN contrast. CONCLUSION: Explicit LN imaging was achieved, in supine RT position, using MRI. Two T2w FSE techniques had the highest detection rates and were motion insensitive. T1w MRI showed anatomical information. MRI enables direct delineation of individual LNs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our optimized MRI scans enable accurate target definition in MRI-guided regional breast RT and development of personalized treatments.
OBJECTIVE: In regional radiotherapy (RT) for patients with breast cancer, lymph node (LN) targets are delineated on CT, defined by anatomical boundaries. By identifying individual LNs, MRI-based delineations may reduce target volumes and thereby toxicity. We optimized MRI sequences for this purpose. Our aim was to evaluate the techniques for LN delineation in RT planning. METHODS: Supine MRI was explored at 1.5 T in RT position (arms in abduction). 5 MRI techniques were optimized in 10 and evaluated in 12 healthy female volunteers. The scans included one T1 weighted (T1w), three T2 weighted (T2w) and a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) technique. Quantitative evaluation was performed by scoring LN numbers per volunteer and per scan. Qualitatively, scans were assessed on seven aspects, including LN contrast, anatomical information and insensitivity to motion during acquisition. RESULTS: Two T2w fast spin-echo (FSE) methods showed the highest LN numbers (median 24 axillary), high contrast, excellent fat suppression and relative insensitivity to motion during acquisition. A third T2w sequence and DWI showed significantly fewer LNs (14 and 10) and proved unsuitable due to motion sensitivity and geometrical uncertainties. T1w MRI showed an intermediate number of LNs (17), provided valuable anatomical information, but lacked LN contrast. CONCLUSION: Explicit LN imaging was achieved, in supine RT position, using MRI. Two T2w FSE techniques had the highest detection rates and were motion insensitive. T1w MRI showed anatomical information. MRI enables direct delineation of individual LNs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our optimized MRI scans enable accurate target definition in MRI-guided regional breast RT and development of personalized treatments.
Authors: Shannon M MacDonald; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Amol Katkar; Brian Napolitano; John Wolfgang; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Mette H Nielsen; Martin Berg; Anders N Pedersen; Karen Andersen; Vladimir Glavicic; Erik H Jakobsen; Ingelise Jensen; Mirjana Josipovic; Ebbe L Lorenzen; Hanne M Nielsen; Lars Stenbygaard; Mette S Thomsen; Susanne Vallentin; Sune Zimmermann; Birgitte V Offersen Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: M A Korteweg; J J M Zwanenburg; P J van Diest; M A A J van den Bosch; P R Luijten; R van Hillegersberg; W P Th M Mali; W B Veldhuis Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-08-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Maureen L Groot Koerkamp; Jeanine E Vasmel; Nicola S Russell; Simona F Shaitelman; Carmel N Anandadas; Adam Currey; Danny Vesprini; Brian M Keller; Chiara De-Colle; Kathy Han; Lior Z Braunstein; Faisal Mahmood; Ebbe L Lorenzen; Marielle E P Philippens; Helena M Verkooijen; Jan J W Lagendijk; Antonetta C Houweling; H J G Desiree van den Bongard; Anna M Kirby Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 6.244