Literature DB >> 20820041

Meta-analysis: Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease.

Jan Menke1, Jörg Larsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive, radiation-free imaging method for studying peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of the lower extremities.
PURPOSE: To summarize evidence of prospective studies about how well MRA identifies or excludes arterial steno-occlusions (50% to 100% lumen reduction) in adults with PAD symptoms. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and 3 other databases were searched from 1998 to 2009 without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers selected 32 studies that compared MRA with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in PAD. Eligible studies were prospective and provided data to reconstruct 2 x 2 or 3 x 3 contingency tables (<50% stenosis vs. > or =50% stenosis or occlusion of arterial segments) in at least 10 patients with PAD symptoms. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently assessed the study quality and extracted the study data, with disagreements resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 32 included studies generally had high methodological quality. About 26% of the 1022 included patients had critical limb ischemia with pain at rest or tissue loss. Overall, the pooled sensitivity of MRA was 94.7% (95% CI, 92.1% to 96.4%) and the specificity was 95.6% (CI, 94.0% to 96.8%) for diagnosing segmental steno-occlusions. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 21.56 (CI, 15.70 to 29.69) and 0.056 (CI, 0.037 to 0.083), respectively. Magnetic resonance angiography correctly classified 95.3%, overstaged 3.1%, and understaged 1.6% of arterial segments. LIMITATION: Similar to most studies of computed tomographic angiography in PAD, the primary studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of MRA on a per-segment basis, not a per-patient basis.
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of 32 prospective studies further increases the evidence that contrast-enhanced MRA has high accuracy for identifying or excluding clinically relevant arterial steno-occlusions in adults with PAD symptoms. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20820041     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  37 in total

1.  Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in critical limb ischemia: performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and TSE-based subtraction techniques.

Authors:  Mustafa A Altaha; Jeffrey D Jaskolka; Kongteng Tan; Manuela Rick; Peter Schmitt; Ravi J Menezes; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Vascular imaging: the evolving role of the multidisciplinary team meeting in peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  Andrew Christie; Giles Roditi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Validation of a rapid, semiautomatic image analysis tool for measurement of gastric accommodation and emptying by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sreerup Banerjee; Sudeepa Dixit; Mark Fox; Anupam Pal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  String-like lumen in below-the-knee chronic total occlusions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography predicts intraluminal recanalization and better blood flow restoration.

Authors:  Yue-Qi Zhu; Hai-Tao Lu; Li-Ming Wei; Fang Liu; Ying-Sheng Cheng; Jian-Bo Wang; Jun-Gong Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose peripheral MR angiography using two-point Dixon fat suppression.

Authors:  Tim Leiner; Jesse Habets; Bastiaan Versluis; Liesbeth Geerts; Eveline Alberts; Niels Blanken; Jeroen Hendrikse; Evert-Jan Vonken; Holger Eggers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Feasibility of Image Fusion for Concurrent MRI Evaluation of Vessel Lumen and Vascular Calcifications in Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Authors:  Ali Serhal; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sjoerd Jens; Mark J W Koelemay; Jim A Reekers; Shandra Bipat
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy and utility of coronary CT angiography with consideration of unevaluable results: A systematic review and multivariate Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with intention to diagnose.

Authors:  Jan Menke; Jörg Kowalski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology research consensus panel on critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Sanjay Misra; Robert Lookstein; John Rundback; Alan T Hirsch; William R Hiatt; Michael R Jaff; Christopher R White; Michael Conte; Patrick Geraghty; Manesh Patel; Kenneth Rosenfield
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.