Literature DB >> 9494486

Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography.

K Y Ho1, T Leiner, M W de Haan, A G Kessels, P J Kitslaar, J M van Engelshoven.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic technique for imaging of the peripheral arteries with gadolinium enhancement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiograms were obtained in 15 healthy volunteers and in 28 patients with intermittent claudication before and during slow infusion of contrast material. Lower- and upper-leg and pelvic regions were imaged. Unenhanced images were subtracted from gadolinium-enhanced images, and maximum intensity projection images were generated. Image quality was evaluated subjectively and objectively, and maximum intensity projection images were compared with conventional angiograms, which served as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography proved to be a robust technique, and image quality on maximum intensity projection images was comparable with that on conventional angiograms. Sensitivity and specificity for grading hemodynamically significant stenoses were 93% and 98%, respectively, with excellent interobserver agreement.
CONCLUSION: Moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography can be used to image all peripheral arteries in 4 minutes by using a small amount of contrast material and a conventional 1.5-T MR imager.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9494486     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  Cardiovascular MR angiography.

Authors:  M R Prince; J M Rubin
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

2.  Contrast enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  A E Stillman
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

3.  Multicenter phase-II trial of safety and efficacy of NC100150 for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Tim Leiner; Kai Yiu J A M Ho; Vincent B Ho; Georg Bongartz; Willem P T M Mali; Wenche Rasch; Jos M A van Engelshoven
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Imaging sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: current role, evolving applications, and technical challenges.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Low-dose intra-arterial contrast-enhanced MR aortography in patients based on a theoretically derived injection protocol.

Authors:  S Potthast; A-C Schulte; G M Bongartz; R Hügli; M Aschwanden; D Bilecen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Variable field of view for spatial resolution improvement in continuously moving table magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; David G Kruger; James F Glockner; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Cross-sectional vascular imaging with CT and MR angiography.

Authors:  Hasan K Kabul; Klaus D Hagspiel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Radial sliding-window magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with highly-constrained projection reconstruction (HYPR).

Authors:  Hyun J Jeong; Ty A Cashen; Michael C Hurley; Christopher Eddleman; Christopher Getch; H Hunt Batjer; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.