Literature DB >> 23589128

Improved design decreases wear in total knee arthroplasty with varus malalignment.

Kazutaka Nishikawa1, Ken Okazaki, Shuichi Matsuda, Yasutaka Tashiro, Shinya Kawahara, Hiroyuki Nakahara, Shigetoshi Okamoto, Takeshi Shimoto, Hidehiko Higaki, Yukihide Iwamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Controversy still exists whether coronal malalignment would influence the long-term survival of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that an improved design of the articular surface of modern TKA would prevent the increase in contact stresses and thus decrease the wear even when the implant was placed in a varus position. Two different designs of TKA were compared biomechanically and clinically.
METHODS: The patients whose prosthesis was initially placed in a varus alignment by the postoperative long-leg radiographs were selected. Seventeen knees using the NexGen LPS and 16 knees using the MG I were examined. Changes in postoperative alignment and the thickness of the polyethylene insert in a follow-up period of approximately 7 years were evaluated. Additionally, an in vitro biomechanical testing was conducted to measure the contact stresses and the contact area at the tibiofemoral joint of the NexGen LPS and the MG I components mounted on a servohydraulic testing device.
RESULTS: Although the long-leg alignment did not change in NexGen LPS, the varus alignment significantly progressed in MG I. The thickness of polyethylene insert in MG I decreased a significantly greater amount compared with that in NexGen LPS. Biomechanical test showed that the NexGen LPS had a larger contact area and lower mean and peak contact stresses than the MG I significantly.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that comprehensive factors of modern prosthesis including improved implant designs could improve the durability of polyethylene insert and decrease implant failures due to component malalignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589128     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2506-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  21 in total

1.  Changes in knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Matsuda; H Miura; R Nagamine; K Urabe; K Harimaya; T Matsunobu; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael E Berend; Merrill A Ritter; John B Meding; Philip M Faris; E Michael Keating; Ryan Redelman; Gregory W Faris; Kenneth E Davis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; J C Hermida; P C Chen; C W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Vincent Y Ng
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Wear of polyethylene against oxidized zirconium femoral components effect of aggressive kinematic conditions and malalignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kace A Ezzet; Juan C Hermida; Nikolai Steklov; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses--a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jiann Jong Liau; Cheng Kung Cheng; Chun Hsiung Huang; Wai Hee Lo
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Joern Adam; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function.

Authors:  Lee M Longstaff; Karen Sloan; Nikki Stamp; Matt Scaddan; Richard Beaver
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?

Authors:  David M Fang; Merrill A Ritter; Kenneth E Davis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  10 in total

1.  Varus femoral and tibial coronal alignments result in different kinematics and kinetics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mutsumi Watanabe; Shinichi Kuriyama; Shinichiro Nakamura; Yoshihisa Tanaka; Kohei Nishitani; Moritoshi Furu; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Preoperative tibial mechanical axis orientation and articular surface design influence on the coronal joint line orientation relative to the ground during gait after total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Koji Murakami; Satoshi Hamai; Ken Okazaki; Satoru Ikebe; Hidehiko Higaki; Takeshi Shimoto; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Remaining mild varus limb alignment leads to better clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kyohei Nishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Kazunari Ishida; Naoki Nakano; Takehiko Matsushita; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  No difference in in vivo polyethylene wear particles between oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Kanako Hata; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi; Yusuke Hashimoto; Fumiaki Inori; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Does Knee Prosthesis Survivorship Improve When Implant Designs Change? Findings from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Stephen E Graves; Richard N de Steiger; David G Campbell; Yi Peng; Alesha Hatton; Michelle Lorimer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Computational study on the effect of malalignment of the tibial component on the biomechanics of total knee arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  D-S Suh; K-T Kang; J Son; O-R Kwon; C Baek; Y-G Koh
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Malpositioning of Prosthesis: Patient-specific Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Standard Off-the-Shelf Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 8.  Comparison of Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty Involving Postoperative Neutral or Residual Mild Varus Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Wan; Yang Yang; Duan Wang; Hong Xu; Chao Huang; Zong-Ke Zhou; Jin Xu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.071

9.  Loading on Attune® fixed-bearing cruciate-substituting total knee implant in knee malalignment during activities of daily living: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Gautam Shetty; Shruti Khairkar
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-12

Review 10.  Ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty-Medial stabilizing technique.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Hiromu Ito
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2015-08-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.